mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Stefan Beller <>
To: Kevin Willford <>
Cc: Jeff King <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] merge-recursive: remove return value from get_files_dirs
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:12:01 -0700
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Kevin Willford <> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:28:28PM -0600, Kevin Willford wrote:
>> > The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
>> > Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
>> > being used for debug output statements.  Also when
>> > read_tree_recursive return value is non zero it is changed to
>> > zero.  This leads me to believe that it doesn't matter if
>> > read_tree_recursive gets an error.
>> Or that the function is buggy. :)
> That was one of my questions as well.  Should read_tree_recursive
> be propagating a -1 and merge_trees be checking for that and bail
> when the call to get_files_dirs return is < 0?  I made a commit with
> this change and ran the tests and they all still passed so either this
> return really doesn't matter or there are not sufficient tests covering
> it.
> I went with this change because it was not changing any of the
> current functionality and if we find a case where it matters that
> read_tree_recursive fails due to bad tree or something else we
> can address it then.
>> I'm tempted to say that we should probably die() when
>> read_tree_recursive fails. This should only happen if we fail to parse
>> the tree, or if our callback (save_files_dirs here) returns failure, and
>> the latter looks like it never happens.
>> > Since the debug output has been removed and the caller isn't
>> > checking the return value there is no reason to keep calulating
>> > and returning a value.
>> Agreed, and I'm happy to see dead code go.
>> Minor nit: s/calulating/calculating/ in your commit message.
> When will that spell checker for git messages be ready? ;)

Different workflows need different setups apparently.
(me, as a heavy user of git-gui, likes the builtin spell checker,
though I need to find a way to train it to accept git lingo, such
as "submodule", or "gitlink")


If you do not use git-gui... you are at the merci of your $EDITOR
($GIT_EDITOR, or core.editor) to have spell checking.

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-28 20:28 [PATCH 0/3] merge-recursive: replace string_list with hashmap Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] merge-recursive: fix memory leak Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 22:42   ` Ben Peart
2017-08-29  8:12   ` Jeff King
2017-08-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] merge-recursive: remove return value from get_files_dirs Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 22:45   ` Ben Peart
2017-08-29  8:19     ` Jeff King
2017-08-29  8:17   ` Jeff King
2017-08-29 15:58     ` Kevin Willford
2017-08-29 16:50       ` Jeff King
2017-08-31 18:12       ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-08-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] merge-recursive: change current file dir string_lists to hashmap Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 23:06   ` Ben Peart
2017-08-29  8:41   ` Jeff King
2017-09-06  3:35   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:

 note: .onion URLs require Tor:
       or Tor2web:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox