git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Kevin Willford <kewillf@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gitster@pobox.com" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] merge-recursive: remove return value from get_files_dirs
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:12:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kacO12xkjt3nBEyyY9VBkdDu+uJ2AnzzEkMnovcO5bigw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR21MB0041575B6D9EE53A07C7D3EDB79F0@DM2PR21MB0041.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Kevin Willford <kewillf@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:28:28PM -0600, Kevin Willford wrote:
>>
>> > The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used.
>> > Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only
>> > being used for debug output statements.  Also when
>> > read_tree_recursive return value is non zero it is changed to
>> > zero.  This leads me to believe that it doesn't matter if
>> > read_tree_recursive gets an error.
>>
>> Or that the function is buggy. :)
>
> That was one of my questions as well.  Should read_tree_recursive
> be propagating a -1 and merge_trees be checking for that and bail
> when the call to get_files_dirs return is < 0?  I made a commit with
> this change and ran the tests and they all still passed so either this
> return really doesn't matter or there are not sufficient tests covering
> it.
>
> I went with this change because it was not changing any of the
> current functionality and if we find a case where it matters that
> read_tree_recursive fails due to bad tree or something else we
> can address it then.
>
>>
>> I'm tempted to say that we should probably die() when
>> read_tree_recursive fails. This should only happen if we fail to parse
>> the tree, or if our callback (save_files_dirs here) returns failure, and
>> the latter looks like it never happens.
>>
>> > Since the debug output has been removed and the caller isn't
>> > checking the return value there is no reason to keep calulating
>> > and returning a value.
>>
>> Agreed, and I'm happy to see dead code go.
>>
>> Minor nit: s/calulating/calculating/ in your commit message.
>
> When will that spell checker for git messages be ready? ;)

Different workflows need different setups apparently.
(me, as a heavy user of git-gui, likes the builtin spell checker,
though I need to find a way to train it to accept git lingo, such
as "submodule", or "gitlink")

Maybe:
https://tarasalenin.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/configure-git-gui-spell-checker-on-windows/

If you do not use git-gui... you are at the merci of your $EDITOR
($GIT_EDITOR, or core.editor) to have spell checking.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-31 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-28 20:28 [PATCH 0/3] merge-recursive: replace string_list with hashmap Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] merge-recursive: fix memory leak Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 22:42   ` Ben Peart
2017-08-29  8:12   ` Jeff King
2017-08-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] merge-recursive: remove return value from get_files_dirs Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 22:45   ` Ben Peart
2017-08-29  8:19     ` Jeff King
2017-08-29  8:17   ` Jeff King
2017-08-29 15:58     ` Kevin Willford
2017-08-29 16:50       ` Jeff King
2017-08-31 18:12       ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-08-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] merge-recursive: change current file dir string_lists to hashmap Kevin Willford
2017-08-28 23:06   ` Ben Peart
2017-08-29  8:41   ` Jeff King
2017-09-06  3:35   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGZ79kacO12xkjt3nBEyyY9VBkdDu+uJ2AnzzEkMnovcO5bigw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sbeller@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kewillf@microsoft.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).