From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Beller Subject: Re: 0 bot for Git Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:52:02 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Greg KH , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Matthieu Moy , lkp@intel.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 12 16:52:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1apzfm-0005qC-CQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:52:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964891AbcDLOwG (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:52:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]:35508 "EHLO mail-ig0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932643AbcDLOwE (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:52:04 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id gy3so89806727igb.0 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:52:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=PriMltC8bQKYh9JYbnOiOzEYBhXTmwQELwX/kcGX8N0=; b=S20WQwGVhsYYrFH4MrKMJGbJrYx6ry98Dbsqs2kE3Df1+j5jv33sqI2G1awkzYK94U 6tKxE0zJlkAGJ5becgowEY5Hnf4fClcH6H6Zd8no/C6X16qLfsoT6ui/evCWEVZDtQbc ila6vVumGwL8b3wD8mSMeHLx2APSnyHPsHN7FFq/sBnxnhxYPz/F4aT1gajLU2Cy6Xoi VAjW6MXXHMIOK4IgTke2LSGTSl1sruvWkEcgPDFwqahR8Mz3sMRg7AEfq2FPzWFTPpTP ClVkidY7cBAPDt6eXvTQi/fTrW+JLgzhbCvaFpVBwrBlNcnwBXPbSMjS2tOeRdxxNYPh q80g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=PriMltC8bQKYh9JYbnOiOzEYBhXTmwQELwX/kcGX8N0=; b=lEpA91E6nFNndnCF8ymTVuggjCmDjghPRBQyjGpixpzTbOUAH9GblyZen9HbBm1OaO sLFrtEGz5r12I9hmFy4UDuQIoCHXEWlp8RVqzX45qrO2A9hmQEWO1/L44j5tc3qyMQaw AKJ27BbERCvm5ImLkUEG+8DErty3EcaChvBKrNvh7YjuQctf8XGBZcFfDdTgAzHacSBr +PatIyxgYQdzRHUHEFKH6siLShKLfTpeMadG2f97KCUR+kQyRhAM59vvCM/x0VRQpttm u93k+XiMwRRhQ82m65I1jClFp4nDrWF+J+SMglnIQQPpEud9T/DUAq4zLI3pdaD1olyl 0Cmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLMam4L5N0OQa6/fgDLuXmQQTLPmiS34S7eOpwvU8QcxTyFclRX5BUcLX/oXJpB7Qkp8jpfWJZTdIlJen6o X-Received: by 10.50.23.80 with SMTP id k16mr26104685igf.94.1460472722608; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.17.27 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:52:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> Hi Greg, >> >> Thanks for your talk at the Git Merge 2016! >> The Git community uses the same workflow as the kernel. So we may be >> interested in the 0 bot which could compile and test each patch on the list. > > In the case of Git, we already have Travis-CI that can do rather > thorough testing automatically (run the complete testsuite on a clean > machine for several configurations). You get the benefit from it only if > you use GitHub pull-requests today. But who uses that? (Not a lot of old-timers here, that's for sure) > It would be interesting to have a > bot watch the list, apply patches and push to a travis-enabled fork of > git.git on GitHub to get the same benefit when posting emails directly > to the list. That is better (and probably more work) than what I had in mind. IIUC the 0 bot can grab a patch from a mailing list and apply it to a base (either the real base as encoded in the patch or a best guess) and then run "make". At least that's how I understand the kernel setup. So my naive thought is that the 0 bot maintainer "only" needs to add another mailing list to the watch list of the 0 bot? Stefan > > -- > Matthieu Moy > http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/