mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Stefan Beller <>
To: Junio C Hamano <>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodule: use cheaper check for submodule pushes
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:14:34 -0700
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Junio C Hamano <> wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <> writes:
>>> In the function push_submodule[1] we use add_submodule_odb[2] to determine
>>> if a submodule has been populated. However the function does not work with
>>> the submodules objects that are added, instead a new child process is used
>>> to perform the actual push in the submodule.
>>> Use is_submodule_populated[3] that is cheaper to guard from unpopulated
>>> submodules.
>>> [1] 'push_submodule' was added in eb21c732d6 (push: teach
>>>     --recurse-submodules the on-demand option, 2012-03-29)
>>> [2] 'add_submodule_odb' was introduced in 752c0c2492 (Add the
>>>     --submodule option to the diff option family, 2009-10-19)
>>> [3] 'is_submodule_populated' was added in 5688c28d81 (submodules:
>>>     add helper to determine if a submodule is populated, 2016-12-16)
>> These footnotes don't answer the question that I really have: why did
>> this use add_submodule_odb in the first place?
>> E.g. did the ref iteration code require access to the object store
>> previously and stop requiring it later?
> Yes, the most important question is if it is safe to lose the access
> to the object store of the submodule.  It is an endgame we should
> aim for to get rid of add_submodule_odb(), but does the rest of this
> codepath not require objects in the submodule at all or do we still
> need to change something to make it so?

Yes, as the code in the current form as well as in its first occurrence
used the result of add_submodule_odb to determine if to spawn a child process.

  reply index

Thread overview: 9+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top])
2017-07-12 23:45 Stefan Beller
2017-07-13  0:01 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-07-13  0:09   ` Stefan Beller
2017-07-13  0:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-13  5:14     ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-07-13 18:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-13 19:39         ` Stefan Beller
2017-07-13 20:48           ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-07-13 20:54             ` Stefan Beller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to, --cc,
  and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='' \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:

 note: .onion URLs require Tor:
       or Tor2web:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox