git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodule: use cheaper check for submodule pushes
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:54:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kZouNBxOKr7X8j6wqebp3Wh3cDqhYR-t_PxaF7AwQ0Wzg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170713204854.GA158114@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> Yes we are safe, because the function itself only spawns a child process
>> (not using any of the objects).
>>
>> It's only caller push_unpushed_submodules also doesn't rely on objects
>> loaded after calling push_submodule.
>>
>> The caller of push_unpushed_submodules (transport.c, transport_push)
>> also doesn't need submodule objects loaded.
>
> Thanks for looking into it.  This is what the commit message should
> say to help reviewers or people trying to understand it later.  The
> footnotes don't help and are distracting, except that it makes sense
> to point out the original GSoC patch to say the alternate submodule
> odb wasn't needed even then.
>
> E.g.:
>
>  Subject: push: do not add submodule odb as an alternate when recursing on demand
>
>  "git push --recurse-submodules=on-demand" adds each submodule as an
>  alternate with add_submodule_odb before checking whether the
>  submodule has anything to push and pushing it if so.
>
>  However, it never accesses any objects from the submodule.  In the
>  parent process it uses the submodule's ref database to see if there
>  is anything to push.  The actual push (which does rely on objects)
>  occurs in a child process.
>
>  The same was try when this call was originally added in
>  v1.7.11-rc0~111^2 (push: teach --recurse-submodules the on-demand
>  option, 2012-03-29).  Most likely it was added by analogy with
>  fetch --recurse-submodules=on-demand, which did use the submodule's
>  object database.
>
>  Use is_submodule_populated_gently instead, which is simpler and
>  cheaper.

Thanks for giving a good example of commit message that I could use
in a reroll.


> With such a commit message change, this seems like a reasonable change
> in principle (though I haven't looked carefully to verify it).
>
> My one doubt is the is_submodule_populated_gently.  Why are we using
> that instead of simpler is_submodule_populated?  The names and API
> comments don't explain.

One could posit this is laziness of thinking.
See 15cdc64776 (make is_submodule_populated gently, 2017-03-14),
and discover there is no non-gentle version of is_submodule_populated.
And for each new use, it may be cheaper to just use the gentle version
instead of adding a non-gentle version.

Thanks,
Stefan

  reply index

Thread overview: 20+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top])
2017-07-12 23:45 Stefan Beller
2017-07-13  0:01 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-07-13  0:09   ` Stefan Beller
2017-07-13  0:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-13  5:14     ` Stefan Beller
2017-07-13 18:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-13 19:39         ` Stefan Beller
2017-07-13 20:48           ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-07-13 20:54             ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-08-15 22:43               ` [PATCH] push: do not add submodule odb as an alternate when recursing on demand Stefan Beller
2017-08-15 23:10                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-08-15 23:14                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-08-15 23:27                   ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-15 23:23                 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-15 23:31                   ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-16  0:11                     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-16  1:05                       ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-16  2:08                         ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-08-16  5:52                           ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-16 16:35                         ` Heiko Voigt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to, --cc,
  and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGZ79kZouNBxOKr7X8j6wqebp3Wh3cDqhYR-t_PxaF7AwQ0Wzg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sbeller@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/
       or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox