mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Stefan Beller <>
To: Yaroslav Halchenko <>,
	Prathamesh Chavan <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: in case you want a use-case with lots of submodules
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:30:28 -0700
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko <> wrote:
> Hi All,
> On a recent trip I've listened to the git minutes podcast episode and
> got excited to hear  Stefan Beller (CCed just in case) describing
> ongoing work on submodules mechanism.  I got excited, since e.g.
> performance improvements would be of great benefit to us too.

If you're mostly interested in performance improvements of the status
quo (i.e. "make git-submodule fast"), then the work of Prathamesh
Chavan (cc'd) might be more interesting to you than what I do.
He is porting git-submodule (which is mostly a shell script nowadays)
to C, such that we can save a lot of process invocations and can do
processing within one process.

> In our project,, git submodules is the basic
> mechanism to bring multiple "datasets" (mix of git and git-annex'ed
> repositories)  under the same roof so we could non-ambiguously
> version them all at any level.

Cool, glad to here submodules being useful. :)

> ATM provides quite a sizeable (ATM 370
> repositories, up to 4 levels deep) hierarchy of git/git-annex
> repositories all tied together via git submodules mechanism.  And as the
> collection grows, interactions with it become slower, so additional
> options (such as --ignore-submodules=dirty  to status) become our
> friends.

I am not as much concerned about the 370 number than about the
4 layers of nesting. In my experience the nested submodule case
is a little bit error prone and the bug reports are not as frequent as
there are not as many users of nesting, yet(?)

In a neighboring thread on the mailing list we have a discussion
on the usefulness of being on branches than in detached HEAD
in the submodules.

This would not break non-ambiguously, rather it would add
ease of use.

> So I thought to share this as a use-case happen you need more
> motivation or just a real-case test-bed for your work.  And thank
> you again for making Git even Greater.

Thanks for the motivation. :)

> P.S. Please CCme in your replies (if any), I am not on the list
> With best regards,


  reply index

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-19 15:59 Yaroslav Halchenko
2017-06-19 19:30 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-06-19 20:20   ` Yaroslav Halchenko
2017-06-20  5:43     ` Stefan Beller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:

 note: .onion URLs require Tor:
       or Tor2web:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox