From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Slow pushes on 'pu' - even when up-to-date..
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:17:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kYXx+a+U3o6FPBy2mHOy4BxxuF97t6iyedPLk0Qw1Jx1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyos78qODyw57V=w13Ux5-8SvBqObJFAq22K+XKPWVbAA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> This seems to be because I'm now on 'pu' as of a day or two ago in
> order to test the abbrev logic, but lookie here:
>
> time git ls-remote ra.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
> .. shows all the branches and tags ..
> real 0m0.655s
> user 0m0.011s
> sys 0m0.004s
>
> so the remote is fast to connect to, and with network connection
> overhead and everything, it's just over half a second. But then:
>
> time git push ra.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
>
> and it just sits there, and it's at 100% CPU the whole time, until it says:
>
> Everything up-to-date
>
> real 1m7.307s
> user 1m2.761s
> sys 0m0.475s
>
> Whaa? It took a *minute* of CPU time to decide that everything was up-to-date?
>
> That's just not right. The branch is entirely up-to-date:
>
> git rev-parse HEAD
> af79ad2b1f337a00aa150b993635b10bc68dc842
>
> git ls-remote ra.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux master
> af79ad2b1f337a00aa150b993635b10bc68dc842 refs/heads/master
>
> so there should be no need for any history walking. But it sure is
> doing *something*. A minute of CPU time on my machine is actually a
> pretty damn big deal.
>
> Looking at the trace, there's no IO - there's no back-and-forth about
> "I have this, do you have it?" or anything like that. The system call
> trace is just a lot of allocations, which I think means that "git
> push" is walking a lot of objects but not doing anything useful.
>
> I bisected it to commit 60cd66f "push: change submodule default to
> check", which makes little sense since I have no submodules, but there
> you go.. Apparently RECURSE_SUBMODULES_CHECK is just terminally
> broken.
Sorry for breaking you, too.
Junio complained about that when I was proposing the topic; but now
the strategy seems to just wait until Heiko fixed the
RECURSE_SUBMODULES_CHECK to be less broken.
* sb/push-make-submodule-check-the-default (2016-08-24) 1 commit
- push: change submodule default to check
Turn the default of "push.recurseSubmodules" to "check".
Will hold to wait for hv/submodule-not-yet-pushed-fix
This reveals that the "check" mode is too inefficient to use in
real projects, even in ones as small as git itself.
cf. <xmqqh9aaot49.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Which itself is
* hv/submodule-not-yet-pushed-fix (2016-09-14) 2 commits
- serialize collection of refs that contain submodule changes
- serialize collection of changed submodules
The code in "git push" to compute if any commit being pushed in the
superproject binds a commit in a submodule that hasn't been pushed
out was overly inefficient, making it unusable even for a small
project that does not have any submodule but have a reasonable
number of refs.
The last two in the original series seem to break a few tests when
queued to 'pu', and dropped for now.
Waiting for a reroll.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-03 21:11 Slow pushes on 'pu' - even when up-to-date Linus Torvalds
2016-10-03 21:17 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2016-10-03 21:23 ` Stefan Beller
2016-10-03 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-04 11:18 ` Heiko Voigt
2016-10-04 11:44 ` Jeff King
2016-10-04 12:04 ` Heiko Voigt
2016-10-04 12:07 ` Jeff King
2016-10-04 16:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-04 16:21 ` Jeff King
2016-10-04 16:40 ` [PATCH] push: change submodule default to check Stefan Beller
2016-10-04 17:34 ` Jeff King
2016-10-04 17:48 ` Stefan Beller
2016-10-04 17:54 ` Jeff King
2016-10-04 18:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-04 18:08 ` Stefan Beller
2016-10-04 18:28 ` Jeff King
2016-10-04 19:29 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] push: change submodule default to check when submodules exist Stefan Beller
2016-10-04 19:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin/push: move flags do_push Stefan Beller
2016-10-04 19:39 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] push: change submodule default to check when submodules exist Jeff King
2016-10-04 19:51 ` Stefan Beller
2016-10-04 21:03 ` [PATCHv3 " Stefan Beller
2016-10-05 13:53 ` Heiko Voigt
2016-10-06 9:23 ` Heiko Voigt
2016-10-06 17:20 ` Stefan Beller
2016-10-07 12:41 ` Heiko Voigt
2016-10-05 15:47 ` Jeff King
2016-10-05 15:54 ` Stefan Beller
2016-10-04 18:00 ` [PATCH] push: change submodule default to check Junio C Hamano
2016-10-04 18:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-10-04 18:05 ` Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGZ79kYXx+a+U3o6FPBy2mHOy4BxxuF97t6iyedPLk0Qw1Jx1A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).