From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH on sb/more-repo-in-api] revision: use commit graph in get_reference()
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:12:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kYOOk2ODYgRcSZgDUqBfx2HeywnEGpbJB9BrrVzEUi_JA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204224238.50966-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:42 PM Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> wrote:
>
> When fetching into a repository, a connectivity check is first made by
> check_exist_and_connected() in builtin/fetch.c that runs:
>
> git rev-list --objects --stdin --not --all --quiet <(list of objects)
>
> If the client repository has many refs, this command can be slow,
> regardless of the nature of the server repository or what is being
> fetched. A profiler reveals that most of the time is spent in
> setup_revisions() (approx. 60/63), and of the time spent in
> setup_revisions(), most of it is spent in parse_object() (approx.
> 49/60). This is because setup_revisions() parses the target of every ref
> (from "--all"), and parse_object() reads the buffer of the object.
>
> Reading the buffer is unnecessary if the repository has a commit graph
> and if the ref points to a commit (which is typically the case). This
> patch uses the commit graph wherever possible; on my computer, when I
> run the above command with a list of 1 object on a many-ref repository,
> I get a speedup from 1.8s to 1.0s.
>
> Another way to accomplish this effect would be to modify parse_object()
> to use the commit graph if possible; however, I did not want to change
> parse_object()'s current behavior of always checking the object
> signature of the returned object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
> ---
> This is on sb/more-repo-in-api because I'm using the repo_parse_commit()
> function.
This is a mere nicety, not strictly required.
Before we had parse_commit(struct commit *) which would accomplish the
same, (and we'd still have that afterwards as a #define falling back onto
the_repository). As the function get_reference() is not the_repository safe
as it contains a call to is_promisor_object() that is repository
agnostic, I think
it would be fair game to not depend on that series. I am not
complaining, though.
> A colleague noticed this issue when handling a mirror clone.
>
> Looking at the bigger picture, the speed of the connectivity check
> during a fetch might be further improved by passing only the negotiation
> tips (obtained through --negotiation-tip) instead of "--all". This patch
> just handles the low-hanging fruit first.
> ---
> revision.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index b5108b75ab..e7da2c57ab 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,20 @@ static struct object *get_reference(struct rev_info *revs, const char *name,
> {
> struct object *object;
>
> - object = parse_object(revs->repo, oid);
> + /*
> + * If the repository has commit graphs, repo_parse_commit() avoids
> + * reading the object buffer, so use it whenever possible.
> + */
> + if (oid_object_info(revs->repo, oid, NULL) == OBJ_COMMIT) {
> + struct commit *c = lookup_commit(revs->repo, oid);
> + if (!repo_parse_commit(revs->repo, c))
> + object = (struct object *) c;
> + else
> + object = NULL;
Would it make sense in this case to rely on parse_object below
instead of assigning NULL? The reason for that would be that
when lookup_commit returns NULL, we would try more broadly.
AFAICT oid_object_info doesn't take advantage of the commit graph,
but just looks up the object header, which is still less than completely
parsing it. Then lookup_commit is overly strict, as it may return
NULL as when there still is a type mismatch (I don't think a mismatch
could happen here, as both rely on just the object store, and not the
commit graph.), so this would be just defensive programming for
the sake of it. I dunno.
struct commit *c;
if (oid_object_info(revs->repo, oid, NULL) == OBJ_COMMIT &&
(c = lookup_commit(revs->repo, oid)) &&
!repo_parse_commit(revs->repo, c))
object = (struct object *) c;
else
object = parse_object(revs->repo, oid);
So with all that said, I still think this is a good patch.
Thanks,
Stefan
> + } else {
> + object = parse_object(revs->repo, oid);
> + }
> +
> if (!object) {
> if (revs->ignore_missing)
> return object;
> --
> 2.19.0.271.gfe8321ec05.dirty
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-04 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 22:42 [PATCH on sb/more-repo-in-api] revision: use commit graph in get_reference() Jonathan Tan
2018-12-04 23:12 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2018-12-06 23:36 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-12-07 13:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-12-05 4:54 ` Jeff King
2018-12-06 23:54 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-12-07 8:53 ` Jeff King
2018-12-05 23:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-12-07 21:50 ` [PATCH on master v2] " Jonathan Tan
2018-12-09 0:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-12-09 1:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-12-11 10:54 ` Jeff King
2018-12-12 19:58 ` Jonathan Tan
2018-12-13 1:27 ` Jeff King
2018-12-13 16:20 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-12-13 18:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Jonathan Tan
2018-12-14 3:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-12-14 8:45 ` Jeff King
2019-01-25 15:33 ` Regression in: [PATCH on sb/more-repo-in-api] " SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-25 19:56 ` Stefan Beller
2019-01-25 22:01 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-01-25 22:14 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-25 22:21 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-27 13:08 ` [PATCH] object_as_type: initialize commit-graph-related fields of 'struct commit' SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-27 13:28 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-01-27 18:40 ` Derrick Stolee
2019-01-28 16:15 ` Jeff King
2019-01-28 16:57 ` Jonathan Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGZ79kYOOk2ODYgRcSZgDUqBfx2HeywnEGpbJB9BrrVzEUi_JA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).