git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Arturas Moskvinas <arturas@uber.com>
To: jonathantanmy@google.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] upload-pack: clear flags before each v2 request
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:05:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGY-PBiH1fKebjgCfrcCTpC9Xue7guqYoE51UpBQJ30zJoxGeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016215850.47821-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>

Hello,

I can confirm that shallow clones are no longer failing.

--
Arturas Moskvinas

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:58 AM Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> wrote:
>
> Suppose a server has the following commit graph:
>
>  A   B
>   \ /
>    O
>
> We create a client by cloning A from the server with depth 1, and add
> many commits to it (so that future fetches span multiple requests due to
> lengthy negotiation). If it then fetches B using protocol v2, the fetch
> spanning multiple requests, the resulting packfile does not contain O
> even though the client did report that A is shallow.
>
> This is because upload_pack_v2() can be called multiple times while
> processing the same session. During the 2nd and all subsequent
> invocations, some object flags remain from the previous invocations. In
> particular, CLIENT_SHALLOW remains, preventing process_shallow() from
> adding client-reported shallows to the "shallows" array, and hence
> pack-objects not knowing about these client-reported shallows.
>
> Therefore, teach upload_pack_v2() to clear object flags at the start of
> each invocation.
>
> (One alternative is to reduce or eliminate usage of object flags in
> protocol v2, but that doesn't seem feasible because almost all 8 flags
> are used pervasively in v2 code.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
> ---
> This was noticed by Arturas Moskvinas <arturas@uber.com> in [1]. The
> reproduction steps given were to repeat a shallow fetch twice in
> succession, but I found it easier to write a more understandable test if
> I made the 2nd fetch an ordinary fetch. In any case, I also reran the
> original reproduction steps, and the fetch completes without error.
>
> This patch doesn't cover the negotiation issue that I mentioned in my
> previous reply [2].
>
> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/CAGY-PBgsG-T3JY=awszwGMpFx+jDx-a1FcV0s6vR067bSqgZaA@mail.gmail.com/
> [2] https://public-inbox.org/git/20181013004356.257709-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/
> ---
>  t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  upload-pack.c          |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh b/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh
> index 88a886975d..70b88385ba 100755
> --- a/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh
> +++ b/t/t5702-protocol-v2.sh
> @@ -429,6 +429,31 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch supports include-tag and tag following' '
>         git -C client cat-file -e $(git -C client rev-parse annotated_tag)
>  '
>
> +test_expect_success 'upload-pack respects client shallows' '
> +       rm -rf server client trace &&
> +
> +       git init server &&
> +       test_commit -C server base &&
> +       test_commit -C server client_has &&
> +
> +       git clone --depth=1 "file://$(pwd)/server" client &&
> +
> +       # Add extra commits to the client so that the whole fetch takes more
> +       # than 1 request (due to negotiation)
> +       for i in $(seq 1 32)
> +       do
> +               test_commit -C client c$i
> +       done &&
> +
> +       git -C server checkout -b newbranch base &&
> +       test_commit -C server client_wants &&
> +
> +       GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client -c protocol.version=2 \
> +               fetch origin newbranch &&
> +       # Ensure that protocol v2 is used
> +       grep "git< version 2" trace
> +'
> +
>  # Test protocol v2 with 'http://' transport
>  #
>  . "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-httpd.sh
> diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c
> index 62a1000f44..de7de1de38 100644
> --- a/upload-pack.c
> +++ b/upload-pack.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
>  #define CLIENT_SHALLOW (1u << 18)
>  #define HIDDEN_REF     (1u << 19)
>
> +#define ALL_FLAGS (THEY_HAVE | OUR_REF | WANTED | COMMON_KNOWN | SHALLOW | \
> +               NOT_SHALLOW | CLIENT_SHALLOW | HIDDEN_REF)
> +
>  static timestamp_t oldest_have;
>
>  static int deepen_relative;
> @@ -1393,6 +1396,8 @@ int upload_pack_v2(struct repository *r, struct argv_array *keys,
>         enum fetch_state state = FETCH_PROCESS_ARGS;
>         struct upload_pack_data data;
>
> +       clear_object_flags(ALL_FLAGS);
> +
>         git_config(upload_pack_config, NULL);
>
>         upload_pack_data_init(&data);
> --
> 2.19.0.271.gfe8321ec05.dirty
>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-17 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-16 21:58 [PATCH] upload-pack: clear flags before each v2 request Jonathan Tan
2018-10-17 12:05 ` Arturas Moskvinas [this message]
2018-10-18  5:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-18 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Clear " Jonathan Tan
2018-10-18 20:43   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] upload-pack: make have_obj not global Jonathan Tan
2018-10-18 20:43   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] upload-pack: make want_obj " Jonathan Tan
2018-10-18 20:43   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] upload-pack: clear flags before each v2 request Jonathan Tan
2018-10-19  3:19   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Clear " Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGY-PBiH1fKebjgCfrcCTpC9Xue7guqYoE51UpBQJ30zJoxGeQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arturas@uber.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).