Re: gitignore + commit with excludes = bug

[Paul Jackson <mailnew4ster@gmail.com>]

Thanks, I hope it gets merged at some point.

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 5:07 PM Matheus Tavares
<matheus.bernardino@usp.br> wrote:
>
> Hi, Paul and Philip
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:55 AM Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On 01/05/2021 19:37, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I stumbled upon what I believe is a bug in git.
> > > See the following reproduction steps:
> > >
> > > mkdir test
> > > cd test
> > > git init
> > > echo 1 > ignored
> > > echo 1 > not-ignored
> > > echo ignored > .gitignore
> > > git add -A -- ':!ignored' || echo 'ERROR!!!'
> > >
> > > In these steps, I ignore the "ignored" file twice - first time in
> > > .gitignore, and second time in the "git add" command. I didn't expect
> > > this to be a problem, but I'm getting the following error message:
> > >
> > > The following paths are ignored by one of your .gitignore files:
> > > ignored
> > >
> > > It looks as if git thinks I wanted to include, not exclude "ignored"
> > > in "git add".
> > I was intrigued by this. The man pages can be hard to decipher, and it
> > may be an 'as designed' feature, but still not intuitive
> >
> > It took a while to find the relevant parts of the man pages.
> >
> > The `-A` option of `add` is under
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-add#Documentation/git-add.txt---no-ignore-removal
> > which has caveats for whether a pathspec is given.
> >
> > The `exclude` magic pathspec is under
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/gitglossary#Documentation/gitglossary.txt-exclude
> > and again has caveats and a double negative regarding whether the
> > `exclude` pathspec counts as a path spec.
> >
> > I _think_ that it is saying that the `exclude` pathspec is ignored for
> > the purpose of the `-A` (all) condition for git add.
>
> Hmm, I think the issue is not really related to `-A`. In fact, if we
> reproduce Paul's original example without `-A`, we still get the
> warning.
>
> The problem seems to be at `dir.c:exclude_matches_pathspec()`, which
> creates the list of ignored files that is later used by `git add` to
> presented the "The following paths are ignored..." warning.
>
> This function ignores the `exclude` magic, so a path 'x' incorrectly
> matches both ':x' and ':!x'. And thus, we end up warning the user about
> 'x' being ignored even when the user had ran `git add ':!x'`.
>
> I think something like this, might solve the problem:
>
> diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> index 3474e67e8f..165ca6a543 100644
> --- a/dir.c
> +++ b/dir.c
> @@ -2042,6 +2042,25 @@ static int exclude_matches_pathspec(const char *path, int pathlen,
>                 const struct pathspec_item *item = &pathspec->items[i];
>                 int len = item->nowildcard_len;
>
> +               if (!(item->magic & PATHSPEC_EXCLUDE))
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               if (len == pathlen &&
> +                   !ps_strncmp(item, item->match, path, pathlen))
> +                       return 0;
> +               if (len > pathlen &&
> +                   item->match[pathlen] == '/' &&
> +                   !ps_strncmp(item, item->match, path, pathlen))
> +                       return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < pathspec->nr; i++) {
> +               const struct pathspec_item *item = &pathspec->items[i];
> +               int len = item->nowildcard_len;
> +
> +               if (item->magic & PATHSPEC_EXCLUDE)
> +                       continue;
> +
>                 if (len == pathlen &&
>                     !ps_strncmp(item, item->match, path, pathlen))
>                         return 1;
> ---
>
> I had to split the original loop into two and handle the `exclude`
> pathspecs first because we cannot let the original loop return early
> when one of the `non-exclude` pathspecs matches the path. Otherwise, we
> would still incorrectly warn the user on executions like
> `git add ignored ':!ignored'`.
>
> (We might also want to extract the matching part to its own function to
> avoid repeating this code on the two loops.)