From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7026209A9 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 08:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753405AbcJOIq3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Oct 2016 04:46:29 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:34386 "EHLO mail-it0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752975AbcJOIq1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Oct 2016 04:46:27 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id e203so718768itc.1 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:46:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Z02Gm+T9jJzpo5cfR9igRMkeIiKzZTsNzwkpG9Rw7i0=; b=BDXmbJMTiUkWDcRfRIzx0ww/77O2UsVdw9v68maUSLD7b4SoV05Y48mSWyZ8E305f5 qDwih6T1/xuiunj9/Mfh2lvmu0D7Nl9t83QSMoyMBUehLRUlS1mFpy30tM8zq2yRs1nG LGv2J1emuPuTS0oBPhYaXXAfUBLBbOjiM5ZhGkG1v4eKT8F04udNErIl6ClRAplTHQ84 TP7lO1/o+oZGeQFr/vseShbLCZeOgxx8/HpSQeFiRdDYWbUa1l4UjAkIuSp4xFYa2pEM AS/J8NzyrChURXpPNcnDblqdbDgjWpSyRVurlt8nGBNdN1SoVcziM6qJYe+DS/dRbFt9 Ww+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z02Gm+T9jJzpo5cfR9igRMkeIiKzZTsNzwkpG9Rw7i0=; b=RDJkPopjogd19VNLNQDIhJcEwDPRkluERtHvZmIj+Tgv2NWMrBg8FwpaSSDpaTmHCB c0ipgfI/C2UiTIYc58IZEylxBp488cEA2r/unLYM/VXRYhSe2O2JI8cVIefzcD77DlZV MK5xKylbrUzrJZIxFCvKHe0eimkEAhrbn3F0YOj8t/QZBQ7rq0tGUsq1s4pCswMvgZUH DHfbeTWB7qCMdGNho9OJudoKe/945t7/Cgc9Na25XAS6bNwqTHEQUhrEPJ+vWFq8Pebv KW++OXjO5758Ff4d/32NPtwseEKKdpfzy8MILcEanefkdIlxhY7546AOx/RQdiARhDkS Sdrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkNyz7k9XAKKfrysLynjsufqej3luvXpmbzn/Som90jyMsI1TpRK6qnFLZrcRwIymd38P8AGfrml+vZuQ== X-Received: by 10.36.225.193 with SMTP id n184mr1134852ith.100.1476521186513; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:46:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.38.215 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 01:46:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <01020157c38b19e0-81123fa5-5d9d-4f64-8f1b-ff336e83ebe4-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <01020157c38b1adc-d5fa6b9a-ce13-4ee9-874e-e45fac99fba6-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> From: Pranit Bauva Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:16:26 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 14/27] t6030: no cleanup with bad merge base To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Git List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hey Junio, On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Pranit Bauva writes: > >> +test_expect_success 'check whether bisection cleanup is not done with bad merges' ' >> + git bisect start $HASH7 $SIDE_HASH7 && >> + test_expect_failure git bisect bad >out 2>out && > > I think you meant "test_must_fail" here. Oh yes! Thanks for pointing it out. I see that you have already submitted a patch to catch this mistake which was previously ignored. Thanks! Regards, Pranit Bauva