From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF431F40E for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758401AbcHCUwH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:52:07 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com ([209.85.161.170]:35125 "EHLO mail-yw0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758386AbcHCUwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:52:05 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id j12so238609148ywb.2 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:52:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E6eYZ/znDFzZwG4uiUByFrMm/6bJsgp4QT+YCwOAg9M=; b=a66R14+32R8P7SlyTY+9lls/1JRDs/YKMEIIF7U0h+kyMXd0zwLgzNudBzBTSKbzDN o/NG55on3CHhp39CMhjHcjTyfatAmdccOZ1ngQXHQTHnc67hzXOTkWil7CAaMNU/ARLX DZX0oNxYIFYB8vWZZUkxXeIprpvTeyEW9XfxxiN9rbY44czvNuhvXlVZiLDk9brRnoBg 6pTjeCqh53G8XE9O1GAwxDfZvKHwPOLNLsRwty5WGFpSNlY2u8Olk0OU/wAuciEO/mFO vBE+62sLmHiVKCotmRyg3vkcD3L/Gf2kHFwZa/S62SG5Ac+1rTmeYDxJbB4Lofaorvv4 TtHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E6eYZ/znDFzZwG4uiUByFrMm/6bJsgp4QT+YCwOAg9M=; b=hG47lutmWK/EINLKjdQ1GgsTtwdQgIutsKGclW6bZnqkeYDzDKMk8r0ATUtqFACjBU +VEQAsDoVofwBe4VxbJZOYjFaKO2DCG5xUhpAzKSN34A3pxTXF7/ulGoi8DLZq1iWtKE LwrmAsRRxcm4iKWm75pHBaHUZ1/yX7IFF/Kd0YvFedMM6yFLd+TbCOgJU1md6SKMdCZI 7nD1Fc60Rnc7mVx67LcnSl+kPbZIHtP3HWkIT35TogK5NTc/RUCJhGmZ6pfHcO1uArp1 xb4viMr5Hw1DHggecxKJsNBIogTXad9jbTgJjXw24HUuAux09DuAaN250sD8UsOs4Idy cUQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouskdXZWt6d20OFEc1Ra/jUH+z7Pzbr5laIYJl8yheYmIoKureYCcmyM0aa/8LCQhFL+3molt0YYf2Xgcg== X-Received: by 10.13.193.135 with SMTP id c129mr53793426ywd.302.1470257523806; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:52:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.89.132 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:52:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0102015640423c26-2060fd70-c90d-4de3-ae8c-1801ad160b1c-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <0102015640423cf7-078bef36-54e8-4200-9097-17d95d4f3c40-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> From: Pranit Bauva Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 02:22:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v11 09/13] bisect--helper: `bisect_write` shell function in C To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Git List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hey Junio, On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Pranit Bauva writes: >> >>> Reimplement the `bisect_write` shell function in C and add a >>> `bisect-write` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from >>> git-bisect.sh >> >> Up to around this step we've seen these patches well enough and I >> think with another reroll or two, they are in good enough shape to >> be split out and frozen for 'next'. We may not be there quite yet, >> but I think we are getting pretty close. >> >> Thanks. > > By the way, this series applied as a whole seems to break t6030. This is only because of argument handling problem. I seemed to have mentioned it in patch 13/13 and also gave the output of the tests. Regards, Pranit Bauva