From: Nikolay Shustov <nikolay.shustov@gmail.com>
To: astian <astian@eclipso.at>
Cc: Git Users <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "groups of files" in Git?
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:04:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEcERAy_OnwzVXPQftm8-TEXF-G0kC4haKCP+CFm31vS8A2XPQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0793138e-5971-d8f6-b25e-215ed5028dae@eclipso.at>
Thank you taking time to think about my issue (I am actually grateful
to everyone in this e-mail thread, who did). I looked into Mercurian
MQ and it doesn't seem to fit what I need - from what I understood, it
speaks about the committed changes and those are not amendable. This
is kinda not what I need.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:27 PM, astian <astian@eclipso.at> wrote:
> Nikolay Shustov wrote:
>> With Perforce, I can have multiple changelists opened, that group the
>> changed files as needed.
>>
>> With Git I cannot seem to finding the possibility to figure out how to
>> achieve the same result. And the problem is that putting change sets
>> on different Git branches (or workdirs, or whatever Git offers that
>> makes the changes to be NOT in the same source tree) is not a viable
>> option from me as I would have to re-build code as I re-integrate the
>> changes between the branches (or whatever changes separation Git
>> feature is used).
>> Build takes time and resources and considering that I have to do it on
>> multiple platforms (I do cross-platform development) it really
>> denominates the option of not having multiple changes in the same code
>> tree.
>>
>> Am I ignorant about some Git feature/way of using Git that would help?
>> Is it worth considering adding to Git a feature like "group of files"
>> that would offer some virtutal grouping of the locally changed files
>> in the checked-out branch?
>
> I never used Perforce and I'm not even sure I understand your problem,
> but I thought I'd mention something that nobody else seems to have yet
> (unless I missed it):
>
> First, one thing that seems obvious to me from your description is that
> these "parallel features" you work on are obviously interdependent,
> therefore I would rather consider the whole thing as a single feature.
> Therefore, it makes sense to me to work in a single "topic branch".
>
> This doesn't preclude one from separating the changes in logically
> sensible pieces. Indeed this is par for the course in Git and people do
> it all the time by dividing the bulk of changes into a carefully chosen
> series of commits.
>
> I think the most common way of doing this is to simply work on the whole
> thing and once you're happy with it you use "git rebase --interative" in
> order to "prettify" your history.
>
> But, and here comes the part I think nobody mentioned yet, if your
> feature work is considerably large or spans a considerably long time it
> may be undesirable to postpone all that work until the very end (perhaps
> by then you already forgot important information, or perhaps too many
> changes have accumulated so reviewing them all becomes significantly
> less efficient). In that case, one solution is to use a "patch
> management system" which will let you do that work incrementally (going
> back and forth as needed).
>
> If you know mercurial, this is "hg mq". I don't think Git has any such
> system built-in, but I know there are at least these external tools that
> integrate with Git:
> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Interfaces,_frontends,_and_tools#Patch-management_Interface_layers
>
> Feel free to ignore this if I totally misunderstood your use case.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-11 15:45 "groups of files" in Git? Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-11 17:18 ` Stefan Beller
2017-07-11 17:47 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-13 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-13 19:47 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-13 21:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-13 22:39 ` Igor Djordjevic
2017-07-13 23:32 ` Igor Djordjevic
2017-07-13 23:40 ` Igor Djordjevic
2017-07-11 17:27 ` Randall S. Becker
2017-07-11 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-11 18:10 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-11 18:19 ` Stefan Beller
2017-07-11 18:30 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-11 17:39 ` Lars Schneider
2017-07-11 17:54 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-11 20:20 ` Lars Schneider
2017-07-13 15:21 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-11 22:46 ` Igor Djordjevic
2017-07-13 15:37 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-13 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-07-13 19:31 ` Nikolay Shustov
2017-07-11 20:09 ` Fredrik Gustafsson
2017-07-11 22:27 ` astian
2017-07-13 17:04 ` Nikolay Shustov [this message]
2017-07-13 23:06 ` Igor Djordjevic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEcERAy_OnwzVXPQftm8-TEXF-G0kC4haKCP+CFm31vS8A2XPQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nikolay.shustov@gmail.com \
--cc=astian@eclipso.at \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).