Re: Git archeology

[Vladimir Gorshenin <gorshenin.vladimir@googlemail.com>]

Hi Christian,

Thank you for the reply.

After I got the reply from Szedar I was so excited about git community
passion for help. And your reply made me ever more assure in it.
Once again thank your for the comprehensive answer. I appreciate
Daniel German's research and going to try token based method in my
task as well.

Have a nice day,

Vladimir

2018-04-21 8:43 GMT+02:00 Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Vladimir Gorshenin
> <gorshenin.vladimir@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My team and I as well as millions of other developers are excited to
>> have such tool at hand as Git. It helps us a lot.
>>
>> Now we challenged ourselves to be even more productive with Git
>> analyzing our usage history.
>
> What kind of analysis do you want to do? Is it the same kind of
> analysis as described in the "Token-based authorship information from
> Git" article (https://lwn.net/Articles/698425/) on LWN.net?
>
>> And there is a problem, which I believe is fundamental for Git (please
>> prove me wrong): how to find all overlapping commits, e.g. touching
>> the same lines of code?
>
> It is not very clear what you would consider overlapping commits or
> commits touching the same lines of code. If some lines of code have
> been duplicated in different files, for example, are the commits
> touching the original lines relevant to what happened to the
> duplicated lines? And what about lines that were moved from one file
> to another or in the same file?
>
>> I played with “Git diff” and “Git blame” but without a reliable
>> result. “Git diff” gives only relative number of lines and it’s not
>> easy to track these number through 1000+ commits. “Git blame” has nice
>> output but without any information about deletion.
>
> Did you try 'git log -L' as Szeder Gábor just suggested?
>
>> What would you advice me to do?
>
> If 'git log -L' and other git commands are not doing what you want,
> you might want to take a look at cregit
> (https://github.com/cregit/cregit) and maybe at other work from the
> people who developed it. The above LWN.net article is about their
> early work.
>
> There are links related to this tool in:
> https://git.github.io/rev_news/2017/05/17/edition-27/