From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE1A1F4B4 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727745AbhAFW0M (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:26:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46904 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727220AbhAFW0M (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:26:12 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC85C061757 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:25:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id x15so4810775ilq.1 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 14:25:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MsHdOTDdCr7grXucsv6oufVeNZjaVktfWUx7YcXNkPQ=; b=A0i+CjIkhh+NCxTw7UkY3RBYUR4VON05SAcDSKNnzr68xVd+oUD47hkoVj0u2ftz2z aBRAx7VpZl6z4/OFPfl/DhDiGTbgzWUyA1Uzwoi2E0HmTU930xQsNkVpbvTfbTnXXfoD JVbamtTVRcbvvz2cM2wv0RWOkYILkZO2xfcjgde/K94qxnOysgN1QbUjj1xKb/DFXiFs bSM5RqmSlfPZ5oVPm1ug0gZwpFY4MDA/l25RjEn75kaRiAymuBYM9pxZwBbVpdqn5aYG 1HP/3T5akv2QtHkbW28F/z5HgahfP41yPIzewaWprmFNedbrkRL0YphNAlzKiVB43E4j jeIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MsHdOTDdCr7grXucsv6oufVeNZjaVktfWUx7YcXNkPQ=; b=JDLpGls+4vrhE/mUHEjzdSUE/9xjdto1Ai8TMHY+u+DKGopMOMCBnYWf2e+7U/Sd/t s7PQ9AAPw9Hl+gU4IbcNSHR/cW6M69xPaWoftI1PW20UNzcN1mbDdInXvobp/y655JMt yTHia0aerO0WseEtIvyRai1GyKdxAb6fxLHIVwxJWekrC7ldae8Ea9dCzdxs2lePKcJW 8mHHuqt0EmbZfo7x3ghkgAmackUIzAfcoCFWALiRqFfpJxKTyrK49MxvWm6lc9xEwpdz rnfxmKQHoz7uAIowE2QRq71b+HDv2opWF93/mKxW9rXN/Ezvq+/3hfPkIlNmyHKW/5QT Fz2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wXCJmAac9gc8T+CAuYR0i81PdNP6DC+6dMTPI/gF9uswDZtJH Jir5nX8juMLn4Xvs396nePi5TPvDk2IaiU2Pl4Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoGKJabm89zAv2BD2OYVYrR8TJSn5ym1NX94prj0YVqrovphERXK087yxfoO7IBLanWTKhwvHSB7ddRX46/5M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1b8a:: with SMTP id h10mr6368129ili.141.1609971931746; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 14:25:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jim Hill Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:25:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New orphan worktree? To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Elijah Newren , Stefan Monnier , Git Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 2:15 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: > not a good example to support the use of the "--orphan" option. I agree with that part, slathering infrastructure and abstractions on oneliners (okay, twoliners) is suspect in my book. worktree add, symoblic ref (really, no need to get lowlevel there, checkout --orphan does it) done. Tag an empty commit and the sequence gets closer to a legit oneliner git worktree add foo empty; git -C foo checkout --orphan newbranch