git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
To: George Vanburgh <george@vanburgh.me>
Cc: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
	Git mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-p4: Fix git-p4.mapUser on Windows
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:04:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE5ih7_+Vc9oqKdjo8h2vgZPup4pto9wd=sBb=W6hCs4tuW2Jg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000f01d273fa$05358ee0$0fa0aca0$@vanburgh.me>

I'm confused....see below.

On 21 January 2017 at 15:21, George Vanburgh <george@vanburgh.me> wrote:
>> On 21 Jan 2017, at 13:33, Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
>> > On 21 Jan 2017, at 13:02, George Vanburgh <george@vanburgh.me>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: George Vanburgh <gvanburgh@bloomberg.net>
>> >
>> > When running git-p4 on Windows, with multiple git-p4.mapUser entries
>> > in git config - no user mappings are applied to the generated
> repository.
>> >
>> > Reproduction Steps:
>> >
>> > 1. Add multiple git-p4.mapUser entries to git config on a Windows
>> >   machine
>> > 2. Attempt to clone a p4 repository
>> >
>> > None of the user mappings will be applied.
>> >
>> > This issue is caused by the fact that gitConfigList, uses
>> > split(os.linesep) to convert the output of git config --get-all into a
>> > list.
>> >
>> > On Windows, os.linesep is equal to '\r\n' - however git.exe returns
>> > configuration with a line seperator of '\n'. This leads to the list
>> > returned by gitConfigList containing only one element - which contains
>> > the full output of git config --get-all in string form. This causes
>> > problems for the code introduced to getUserMapFromPerforceServer in
>> > 10d08a1.
>> >
>> > This issue should be caught by the test introduced in 10d08a1, and
>> > would require running on Windows to reproduce. When running inside
>> > MinGW/Cygwin, however, os.linesep correctly returns '\n', and
>> > everything works as expected.
>>
>> This surprises me. I would expect `\r\n` in a MinGW env...
>> Nevertheless, I wouldn't have caught that as I don't run the git-p4 tests
> on
>> Windows...
>
> It appears I was mistaken - the successful tests I ran were actually under
> the Ubuntu subsystem for Windows, which (obviously) passed.
>
> Just did a quick experiment:
>
> Git Bash (MinGW):
> georg@TEMPEST MINGW64 ~
> $ python -c "import os
> print(repr(os.linesep))"
> '\r\n'
>
> Powershell:
> PS C:\Users\georg> python -c "import os
>>> print(repr(os.linesep))"
> '\r\n'
>
> Ubuntu subsystem for Windows:
> george@TEMPEST:~$ python -c "import os
> print(repr(os.linesep))"
> '\n'
>
> So this issue applies to git-p4 running under both PowerShell and MinGW.
>
>>
>>
>> > The simplest fix for this issue would be to convert the line split
>> > logic inside gitConfigList to use splitlines(), which splits on any
>> > standard line delimiter. However, this function was only introduced in
>> > Python 2.7, and would mean a bump in the minimum required version of
>> > Python required to run git-p4. The alternative fix, implemented here,
>> > is to use '\n' as a delimiter, which git.exe appears to output
>> > consistently on Windows anyway.

Have you tried a 2.6 Python with splitlines? I just tried this code
and it seems fine.

> val = s.strip().splitlines()
> print("splitlines:", val)

Tried with 2.7 and 2.6, and bot print out an array of strings returned
from read_pipe().

And 'grep -r splitlines' on the Python2.6 source has lots of hits.

>>
>> Well, that also means if we ever use splitlines() then your fix below
> would
>> brake the code, right?
>>
>> Python 2.7 was released 7 years ago in 2010.
>
> Now I feel old...

:-)

>
>> Therefore, I would vote to
>> bump the minimum version. But that's just my opinion :-)
>
> I feel like splitlines is the better/safer fix - but figured bumping the
> minimum
> Python version was probably part of a wider discussion. If it's something
> people
> are comfortable with - I'd be happy to rework the fix to use splitlines.
> Luke - do you have any thoughts on this?

I agree that we have to stop supporting 2.6 at some point (and start
supporting 3.x, but that's another world of hurt). But does 2.6 really
not have splitlines?

If you send a patch with splitlines I can try it out (although I guess
it could be broken under Windows).

Luke

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-22 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-21 12:02 [PATCH] git-p4: Fix git-p4.mapUser on Windows George Vanburgh
2017-01-21 13:32 ` Lars Schneider
2017-01-21 15:21   ` George Vanburgh
2017-01-22 13:04     ` Luke Diamand [this message]
2017-01-22 14:14       ` George Vanburgh
2017-01-25  9:17 ` [PATCH v2] " George Vanburgh
2017-01-27 17:33   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-29 17:10     ` Luke Diamand
2017-01-30 17:07       ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAE5ih7_+Vc9oqKdjo8h2vgZPup4pto9wd=sBb=W6hCs4tuW2Jg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=luke@diamand.org \
    --cc=george@vanburgh.me \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).