git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: John Shahid <jvshahid@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>, Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Subject: Re: git push recurse.submodules behavior changed in 2.13
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:11:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAE5=+KWOxNxsLGEV3FEf0i7WM20ttE_34D7qHiPAvRAWi+6JAg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79ka=icZDS-6q2dGSxyeLxYw+Zd1M_DSWzmhmHYtbTQTvZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 6:28 AM, John Shahid <jvshahid@gmail.com> wrote:
>> bump. it's been a while and I'm still not clear what the next steps
>> are. I'm happy to send a patch but I would like to get a consensus
>> first.
>
> What do you want a consensus on?
> (Is the change in 2.13 a bug or feature? I considered it enough
> of a feature to not pursue an urgent bug fix. Maybe I misunderstood
> the discussion)

I was under the impression that Jonathan and may be others considered
the fact that `git push --recurse-submodules=on-demand` doesn't work
as before an unintentional change. He asked me previously if pushing
without a refspec will work for us and I responded with a yes. The
question remains if everyone is on board with change push without
refspec to use `push.default` in the parent repo as well as
submodules.

Cheers,

JS

      reply index

Thread overview: 10+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top])
2017-05-27 13:31 John Shahid
2017-05-29  2:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-29  4:20   ` Stefan Beller
2017-05-30 12:01     ` John Shahid
2017-05-30 17:05       ` Brandon Williams
2017-05-30 18:10 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-31 14:50   ` John Shahid
2017-06-10 13:28     ` John Shahid
2017-06-12 17:27       ` Stefan Beller
2017-06-16 14:11         ` John Shahid [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to, --cc,
  and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAE5=+KWOxNxsLGEV3FEf0i7WM20ttE_34D7qHiPAvRAWi+6JAg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jvshahid@gmail.com \
    --cc=bmwill@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/
       or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox