From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DC51F5AE for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 06:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231371AbhEMGqH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 02:46:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52712 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230063AbhEMGqG (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 02:46:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F48C061574 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 23:44:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id c17so20841097pfn.6 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 23:44:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IJlvE6hKCOmdBq2Bovh18YaVNEHx939lWV90TAsMObg=; b=mv8PDipXtqCZi8qFEhf3Ts8T/rgW8TSzKsd1bu32l8T5s79ZFGcZdJIWxajMIIlQtK cckx0hKdMGi4EkqOgQ+a07RNSLZ+5Ub07dUlM4W/WjZhRayNBYgfo9j5mygX6aBp2Dzb 0XBKU9gDnQTkXTYJ3lRzTeb18OT/Yw5xVRUank5AqnH4MVsi450a1t4t3F80ufTQ183i 52twtl85RVYlzg3sL6yv8tvelo0qvMyICj1S6AtfvXHIScd8Rffn17CdUPG8PDVy4/Qk aJKYhz4aSla20AoY31zZrVczEtygQfIms7kMM7w0Bo7oj8ZTo9ClZ4IFrwwcPEjU57Tv f6QA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IJlvE6hKCOmdBq2Bovh18YaVNEHx939lWV90TAsMObg=; b=eXTvpEbcqf+BtmbQ2z+l5udj4szmglHs1nuMXmNUqI+0ScyKqI+261+5jpWnooCZi0 6G7hCnAg+APGSOYrDwpyJJ79tuFC8qR6nq47La2SQTLCbyzbZ04d4CcN0NBNO87Qp2fN iskCUHggCbvvPutL3ntL41wf3I5gOG/1W/FOA3wdQydVsfJ7ftvWw1g2uhlxJgBMT8Zm DKqKJLtWVy9y51c3W40lJG+tXNjGybVqA7G6sqexg+/EAtQE10rUcCLAPF18++7hnpeC cBbl85vUX53Prh+4GRTMD/AepS0/1og4DzVhMqnFELykMzM2qzK4PeyZ8B/I8WJVBUhk Eq0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M1ZgsMUQGRS1ik03avBHbBGF+/ECUJ+CyfWRXabUPJTiLjsXX 8ucUJbh0MifdqfzT7Pq9M/U+Dt0ExrqZEg+nq1E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyPH+6NGG1lAIk4pvJRLpw+oHCavQsVNqq/pjL2Fhw3j8vWOSetWknHYgJSLRxFPZLg2qFf5lQSo04FZcp5ao= X-Received: by 2002:a63:5947:: with SMTP id j7mr41024288pgm.248.1620888296579; Wed, 12 May 2021 23:44:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Teng Long Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 14:44:45 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description To: gitster@pobox.com Cc: dyroneteng@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, jonathantanmy@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: >Yes. Some people seem to omit the final response to reviewer >suggestions on the previous round and just send a revised patch, but >it is much nicer to cleanly conclude the review cycle for the >previous round with a separate response (it could just be "yes, >you're right---I'll incorporate your suggestions in the next round, >thanks") before starting a new cycle. If I send a new patch cycle, the "--thread" argument seems to be recommended. This may be the reason why it is easier to understand when submitting a series of patches? I may try to use "--thread", but it may make this whole patch more confusing, sorry for that.