From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Duy Nguyen Subject: Re: Git tag output order is incorrect (IMHO) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 23:14:54 +0700 Message-ID: References: <840FACA0-7E13-41DB-A0F8-124FAB53BFBD@rtcamp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git Mailing List To: Rahul Bansal X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 18 18:15:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UzqrZ-00052S-Jn for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:15:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758908Ab3GRQPZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:15:25 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.219.45]:52261 "EHLO mail-oa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758329Ab3GRQPZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:15:25 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j1so4342671oag.4 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:15:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OoDNhImfAG8Jzln2gdkNn93MI8ndPP+BNl9vu8ATv3o=; b=dSoWMyivTZkQvJINet13Wg9HmtO0AO1fKCLiJnrVa7IQoteL4ugZaraD906ADinKj5 f9Thkr9E1dJS6THM5KJ9LHZD806RyQaI3i17HZuRH2yXsP7BRNNuufV+r7c64whsQac8 cf+ANAFzK4xIklUznGEiZBOw3vaGH8vD5H/Yqj3wXS4hNm9+lM9dsJv2LccRU1U+LYaf EjyBJHjGWQoRinvvp9Fs3LxtWnPJqqSb8ul3ewkmOh/D0+muOTet7Jow7w3148mQE8A3 w6CgVyp4LHYpncYfQfU+/NpjsThUrIxpPFkq3Ams+sGZRIUBu9WCIXQan7pXU1b37oft +6AA== X-Received: by 10.60.83.116 with SMTP id p20mr13874570oey.83.1374164124587; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.88.230 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:14:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Rahul Bansal wrote: > Hi Day, > > I am aware of that command as well. > > I think `git tag` current default order is string-based sorting. I > felt version-number based sorting and/or create-date based sorting > will be more appropriate. ok you mean the _default_ order? What about other non-version tags (even temporary ones just to mark something then removed)? -- Duy