From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-worktree: use working tree for trees on the file system
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:05:11 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8D-+uO2GabNGLcTvfs7k8NrG1x200j3nOx11u8uUdzZVw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqvar2ska7.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>>>
>>>>> While it may be true that you can have bare worktrees; I would question
>>>>> why anyone wants to do this, as the only thing it provides is an
>>>>> additional HEAD (plus its reflog).
>>>>
>>>> A more plausible situation is you start with a bare one as the
>>>> primary and used to make local clones to do your work in the world
>>>> before "git worktree". It would be a natural extension to your
>>>> workflow to instead create worktrees of of that bare one as the
>>>> primary worktree with secondaries with working trees.
>>>
>>> For what it's worth, this conversation makes me think it was a mistake
>>> to call this construct a worktree.
>>
>> For the record, I am totally confused with Junio's last line, with two
>> "with"s, "worktree" and "working trees" in the same phrase :D
>
> In case this wasn't just a tangential note, what I meant was:
>
> - In the old world, you may have had a single bare repository and
> then made clones, each of which has a working tree (i.e. non-bare
> clones), and worked inside these clones.
>
> - In the "git worktree" world, you can start from that same single
> bare repository, but instead of cloning it, use "git worktree" to
> create "worktree"s, each of which has a working tree, and work
> inside these "worktree"s.
>
> and the latter would be a natural extension to the workflow the
> former wanted to use.
Yes I really want that, and even the ability to convert a normal one
repo (with one working tree) to the latter, moving the repository to
somewhere safe.
>>> It's fine for the command to have one name and the documentation to
>>> use a longer, clearer name to explain it. What should that longer,
>>> clearer name be?
>>
>> No comments from me. I'll let you know that if Eric (or Junio?) didn't
>> stop me, we would have had $GIT_DIR/repos now instead of
>> $GIT_DIR/worktrees, just some extra confusion toppings.
>
> I forgot about that part of the history, but you are saying you
> wanted to call these "repos", not "worktrees"?
From $GIT_DIR perspective (which points to
$GIT_COMMON_DIR/worktrees/blah) then they do look like a repository
with lots of part borrowed from $GIT_COMMON_DIR. I was simply saying
I'm bad at naming things. "worktrees" is a better name than "repos".
> I can see why
> somebody (or me?) would stop that by fearing "repo" is a bit too
> confusing with a "repository", in the same way that we are now
> realizing that "worktree" is too similar to an old synonym we used
> to call "working tree".
--
Duy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-25 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 20:44 [PATCH 0/4] git-prompt.sh: Full patch for submodule indicator Benjamin Fuchs
2017-01-30 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] git-prompt.sh: add " Benjamin Fuchs
2017-01-30 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-31 0:10 ` Benjamin Fuchs
2017-01-31 3:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-06 4:23 ` Stefan Beller
2017-02-06 5:55 ` Jacob Keller
2017-02-06 10:13 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-30 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] git-prompt.sh: rework of " Benjamin Fuchs
2017-01-31 18:06 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-01-30 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] git-prompt.sh: fix for submodule 'dirty' indicator Benjamin Fuchs
2017-01-30 20:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] git-prompt.sh: add tests for submodule indicator Benjamin Fuchs
2017-01-31 18:32 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-01-31 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-31 22:12 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-07 3:45 ` [RFC PATCH] rev-parse: add --show-superproject-working-tree Stefan Beller
2017-03-07 5:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-07 7:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-07 7:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-07 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-07 20:40 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-07 22:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-08 0:56 ` [PATCHv2] " Stefan Beller
2017-03-08 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-08 6:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-08 19:20 ` [PATCHv3] " Stefan Beller
2017-03-08 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-08 23:07 ` [PATCHv4] " Stefan Beller
2017-03-08 23:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-17 22:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-17 22:51 ` [PATCH] Documentation/git-worktree: use working tree for trees on the file system Stefan Beller
2017-03-17 22:55 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-17 23:04 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-18 17:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-18 1:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-18 1:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-20 17:29 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-20 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-20 18:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-20 19:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] use "working trees" instead of "worktree" in our API Stefan Beller
2017-03-20 19:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] git.c: introduce --working-tree superseding --work-tree Stefan Beller
2017-03-20 19:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-20 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] revparse: introduce --is-inside-working-tree Stefan Beller
2017-03-20 20:00 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-20 19:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] use "working trees" instead of "worktree" in our API Junio C Hamano
2017-03-21 10:37 ` [PATCH] Documentation/git-worktree: use working tree for trees on the file system Duy Nguyen
2017-03-21 15:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-23 17:06 ` Michael J Gruber
2017-03-23 17:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-25 12:07 ` Duy Nguyen
2017-04-07 13:59 ` Michael J Gruber
2017-04-07 16:14 ` Jacob Keller
2017-03-25 12:05 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACsJy8D-+uO2GabNGLcTvfs7k8NrG1x200j3nOx11u8uUdzZVw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).