From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: /* compiler workaround */ - what was the issue?
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:17:56 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8CBuU8H8r_f4KsnLkhLtfRv0nDo4hGS31LVn0e1Y_3OAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtwic9o88.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
>
>> int saved_namelen = saved_namelen; /* compiler workaround */
>>
>> Which then becomes an MSVC compile warning C4700: uninitialized local
>> variable.
>>
>> I'm wondering what was the compiler workaround being referred to? i.e. why
>> does it need that tweak? There's no mention of the reason in the commit
>> message.
>
> That was a fairly well-known workaround for GCC that issues a false
> warning that variable is used before initialized. I thought we
> stopped using it several years ago in new code after doing a bulk
> sanitizing
I guess that's 803a777 (cat-file: Fix an gcc -Wuninitialized warning -
2013-03-26) and more commits around that time. The split-index commit
is in 2014. I must have missed the trend.
> (I think the new recommended workaround was to initialise
> such a variable to the nil value like '0' for integers).
Yep. First Jeff removed the " = xxx" part from "xxx = xxx" then Ramsay
added the " = NULL" back. So we probably just do "int saved_namelen =
0;" in this case.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-06 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AA5B2B1715BAF7438221293187A417A7BDE9D11D@desmdswms002.des.grplnk.net>
2016-05-05 20:48 ` /* compiler workaround */ - what was the issue? Philip Oakley
2016-05-05 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-06 10:17 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2016-05-06 13:15 ` Philip Oakley
2016-05-06 18:05 ` Ramsay Jones
2016-05-06 18:33 ` Philip Oakley
2016-05-06 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-06 19:30 ` Marc Branchaud
2016-05-06 19:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-06 20:01 ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-09 19:40 ` Philip Oakley
2016-05-09 19:49 ` Randall S. Becker
2016-05-06 20:28 ` Marc Branchaud
2016-05-06 20:21 ` Ramsay Jones
2016-05-06 21:17 ` Ramsay Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACsJy8CBuU8H8r_f4KsnLkhLtfRv0nDo4hGS31LVn0e1Y_3OAQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).