From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2B320A79 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751364AbdBBLX2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2017 06:23:28 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:36418 "EHLO mail-ot0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbdBBLX1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2017 06:23:27 -0500 Received: by mail-ot0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 32so9371581oth.3 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 03:23:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TrWyZWYi0F6eCfTdMV6DH9DeSJ3qubsKH3oH/88ilTY=; b=bVDYv6+1IHUzPnn8Ew+OfV5dzIOSHksEBW8MkG7Vs+7OTZZj+OSvxticu7YTAuXL6Z t/nksPxx54O7FzEqrwNzBq7N1CEeI/xy6CNMy27oDUeNReiCcV00oV020cBpKySaQWea ZNi4EGo47ULB8Bp3imcs3L83BavXHgArWhAJ4vDJJQ9dUAsYWvEpxl+DvypEN6HikDHV uHHQabdeXIhZ4c9FEUn1H4zriW39bjs38AAgSrhmWT6tznbgWV3hkN4ZNM44JNMF0Rhx E7og4SARu3HbKJd0wllTc8FU8a5p56ixFCzDBA2+IPYYh0TjIQSMFp07oFtctYZ1UQfp BebQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TrWyZWYi0F6eCfTdMV6DH9DeSJ3qubsKH3oH/88ilTY=; b=n/qsPwxX9yfksVK7gXNjxr0AvEMVDeGDsNsPOt55Yixix7Ts1NLfYnN7CIex2C/Q0+ kWVlt7zrDVL2obI2L4b5QYJBmTzpOq8q7BXPugbFJPKjpGTS/Nvrx01T//JYgLrh0qEE StCGBAoeckcKbEyup4xI9wWYxgVjtEikRo7mhuRsVS92/lMFGw9hyQZrHTS38DlxCFK9 1P7pBM9c/x3yrVXGhy+LvQ2xLoR6RYtHPgDOTXwKC9ztp8aBxQtrzF16pJ6M0AsjPPyr qpKdsuGqhJNu2yeoRFZ4RFjdHPkoYjWrabQcMlCk08qVY7miM7t+C3b1GKnprkPdagu+ 6xTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kRNampIHI2/OTCKU0EWl3FQ+ix6+d6NgmkJ9dloaMC36M/VQ+oOJa+shVcWOIwbH6B5UFbeF5/ujoqpg== X-Received: by 10.157.20.146 with SMTP id d18mr3628297ote.37.1486034601512; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 03:23:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.158.1 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 03:22:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170202085007.21418-1-pclouds@gmail.com> From: Duy Nguyen Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:22:50 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] nd/worktree-move update To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Duy, > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin >> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguy=E1=BB=85n Th=C3=A1i Ng=E1=BB=8Dc Duy wrote= : >> >> > >> >> >> This squashes two changes from Johannes and Ramsay: [...] >> >> > >> >> > Sorry, I lost track of the worktree discussions... Could you remind >> >> > me which patch is supposed to fix my continuous reflog corruption? >> >> >> >> The corruption caused by git-gc? It's not fixed. All the changes in >> >> this series is shown here. >> > >> > Oh sorry, I meant to ask "and if it is not in this patch series, would= you >> > mind pointing me at the patch series that has that fix?" >> >> You meant this one [1]? There is nothing substantial since then. >> >> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/%3C20160601104519.16563-1-pclouds@gmail= .com%3E/ > > I guess I mean that. > > Given that this results in real data loss, it is surprising that this has > not made it even into `pu` yet! I could rebase and clean it up a bit if you need it, but I don't think it'll end up in 'pu' or anywhere near since Junio wanted a cleaner approach [1]. That means (as far as I can see) a lot more work around refs store and backend area before it's ready to handle "get refs from this worktree store" (or "get refs from every reachable stores"). [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqshwwzyee.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.c= om/ --=20 Duy