From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9171F453 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728443AbeKJBuJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 20:50:09 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:41125 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728008AbeKJBuJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 20:50:09 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id a5-v6so1611438ioq.8 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:08:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TTQSW0fHboqD/SQjXRmqSlH1notXdmYt8QjL4Tb3+zc=; b=qz7ApiQz4JnWXn6sDQ/vhgiDB/aVVpUy+awnUQHtiaCKoNoZQrKgz7UTel9ESSK6Q+ mT8fICNxOkOH/VT1F0mrLmf+fkuBTbs3J+7EN6NRbusYN0kT4XitfN7jodrdNifLyvHH FpuPxZ5JEVWjCIcTRPuZRHWkhuAbQikYrCe3fAlv3JJNQ0smjrFigF1uySEseLvzIzd7 URpM4onsN0iyUHhqOr8CIAAVCWyO/FB1FSExCkwAURNMp5BVsAXp+grKfZmvzvwZ7zkK VsYwln/sukR8aSil8S4vbPn1nupB5WtQES2hiCBCvUjAJCQmnXlz1usYh9MAdqPtzUTC ewmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TTQSW0fHboqD/SQjXRmqSlH1notXdmYt8QjL4Tb3+zc=; b=kE+hPhxe82vOk+0QwZ9BIpjhGvxX72duBlgULyM2vdTGBLj5INnqUc7NDmkF9hXQTt mHgQr+MggNbniQKfTUV13+NMYmXdGTKXnMGqLHlRLfFwqD4U3HETRMW1iGkQ2RTe4HQA rMiARsNaF2uWscKmzs/5DmU9UX7Igr6zLUwc6cN8s97r5w2Pln+df94em8QInzjl4uaj 8o/5Nf7wZqI6YjB/L1zcia/prmcASM44xtMBdk+jnWU44drmOzZWDWxH07HcBqxwivr+ g2aCB4P8A93eaI4FpwKfX+a7Nb0kwMlAgFdY4aakOgjsInxvIxOW9eJ/XWYz7q+rFfRa R9gA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJbRZIbGaFoJ9JB39Ui1IPyWGsEoTrWYOB52gJlH5IVYzIBWW8p gAg2L3le8OFxS3osen24qWtSjLHlsD7jEz7pK+vfIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eVq1uXiwi11ulLjCClqiytz6EStHpBmzFdjQDW5/BhOWlWu4ZiX9RGNG5Y/TwZfauVUz1LeO8yYht5JnlqrI4= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6f0e:: with SMTP id k14-v6mr3514087ioc.236.1541779736420; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:08:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87o9bgl9yl.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20181027093300.GA23974@sigill.intra.peff.net> <87lg6jljmf.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20181029150453.GH17668@sigill.intra.peff.net> <87bm7clf4o.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20181029232738.GC24557@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20181107225524.GA119693@amazon.com> <87d0re5pt3.fsf@evledraar.booking.com> In-Reply-To: <87d0re5pt3.fsf@evledraar.booking.com> From: Duy Nguyen Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:08:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] index-pack: improve performance on NFS To: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Cc: gerardu@amazon.com, Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:46 PM =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason wrote: > I'm planning to re-submit mine with some minor changes after the great > Documentation/config* move lands. > > As noted in > https://public-inbox.org/git/87bm7clf4o.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ and > https://public-inbox.org/git/87h8gq5zmc.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ I think > it's regardless of Jeff's optimization is. O(nothing) is always faster > than O(something), particularly (as explained in that E-Mail) on NFS. Is it really worth adding more code to maintain just to shave a couple seconds (or a few percent clone time)? --=20 Duy