From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Cc: "Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Sebastian Schuberth" <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] config: add conditional include
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:32:42 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8BokiiDbheN1_CqWWgK3xRn8YP30t7ojjVeDnok5_M4Ow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vpqlgzp9bw1.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Matthieu Moy
<Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
>>> I think the syntax should be design to allow arbitrary boolean
>>> expression later if needed.
>>
>> I would be against that. We may extend it more in future, but it
>> should be under control, not full boolean expressions.
>
> Why?
>
> I'm not saying we absolutely need it, but if we allow several kinds of
> conditions (gitdir-is:... and others in the future), then it's natural
> to allow combining them, and arbitrary boolean expression is both simple
> and powerful (operators and/or/not and parenthesis and you have
> everything you'll ever need).
For starter, we don't want another debate "python vs ruby vs lua vs
..." as the scripting language :) (for the record I vote Scheme! maybe
with infix syntax)
Seriously though, for things that are evaluated in the background
every single time a command is executed and things that come from many
different places (/etc, $HOME, $XDG, $GIT_DIR) I think absolute
flexibility just makes it harder to pinpoint when things go wrong.
Combination in this case would be a bad thing, not a good one. By
judging case by case before introducing a new condition type, we
probably can see what sort of combination would be and whether we
could accept that.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-22 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-26 7:06 [PATCH] config: add conditional include Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-26 18:27 ` Jeff King
2016-06-27 16:14 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-06-27 16:20 ` Jeff King
2016-06-27 16:32 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-06-27 16:35 ` Jeff King
2016-06-28 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Config " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-28 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] add skip_prefix_mem helper Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-28 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] config: add conditional include Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-06-28 20:49 ` Jeff King
2016-06-29 4:06 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-06-28 23:11 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-07-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-07-13 7:21 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-07-13 7:26 ` Jeff King
2016-07-13 12:48 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-07-13 15:57 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-07-14 15:33 ` [PATCH v4] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2016-07-14 15:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-14 16:13 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-07-16 13:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-16 14:48 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-07-16 15:08 ` Jeff King
2016-07-16 16:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-16 16:47 ` Jeff King
2016-07-17 8:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-20 13:31 ` Jeff King
2016-07-20 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-20 16:39 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-13 8:40 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-19 13:54 ` Jeff King
2016-08-20 21:08 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-22 12:43 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-22 12:59 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-08-22 13:09 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-22 13:22 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-08-22 13:32 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2016-08-23 13:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-08-24 9:37 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-24 12:44 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-08-24 14:17 ` Jeff King
2016-06-28 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Config " Jeff King
2016-06-28 20:51 ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-28 21:03 ` Jeff King
2016-06-29 4:09 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-06-28 22:11 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACsJy8BokiiDbheN1_CqWWgK3xRn8YP30t7ojjVeDnok5_M4Ow@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sschuberth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).