git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
@ 2013-07-12  5:37 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
  2013-07-12  5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy @ 2013-07-12  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git; +Cc: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy

The document says one cannot push from a shallow clone. But that is
not true (maybe it was at some point in the past). The client does not
stop such a push nor does it give any indication to the receiver that
this is a shallow push. If the receiver accepts it, it's in.

Since 52fed6e (receive-pack: check connectivity before concluding "git
push" - 2011-09-02), receive-pack is prepared to deal with broken
push, a shallow push can't cause any corruption. Update the document
to reflect that.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/git-clone.txt | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
index 450f158..85769b8 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
@@ -182,11 +182,13 @@ objects from the source repository into a pack in the cloned repository.
 --depth <depth>::
 	Create a 'shallow' clone with a history truncated to the
 	specified number of revisions.  A shallow repository has a
-	number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from
-	it, nor push from nor into it), but is adequate if you
-	are only interested in the recent history of a large project
-	with a long history, and would want to send in fixes
-	as patches.
+	number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from it, nor
+	push into it), but is adequate if you are only interested in
+	the recent history of a large project with a long history.
++
+Pushing from a shallow clone should be avoided if the git version on
+the receiver end is older than v1.7.10, or any other git
+implementation that does not perform connectivity check.
 
 --[no-]single-branch::
 	Clone only the history leading to the tip of a single branch,
-- 
1.8.2.82.gc24b958

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-12  5:37 [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
@ 2013-07-12  5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
  2013-07-12  5:54 ` Junio C Hamano
  2013-07-13 21:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-07-12  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy; +Cc: git

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> The document says one cannot push from a shallow clone. But that is
> not true (maybe it was at some point in the past). The client does not
> stop such a push nor does it give any indication to the receiver that
> this is a shallow push. If the receiver accepts it, it's in.
>
> Since 52fed6e (receive-pack: check connectivity before concluding "git
> push" - 2011-09-02), receive-pack is prepared to deal with broken
> push, a shallow push can't cause any corruption. Update the document
> to reflect that.

Err, what are these lines in builtin/receive-pack.c doing, then?

        int cmd_receive_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
        {
                ...
                setup_path();

                if (!enter_repo(dir, 0))
                        die("'%s' does not appear to be a git repository", dir);

                if (is_repository_shallow())
                        die("attempt to push into a shallow repository");
                ...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-12  5:37 [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
  2013-07-12  5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2013-07-12  5:54 ` Junio C Hamano
  2013-07-12  7:54   ` Duy Nguyen
  2013-07-13 21:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-07-12  5:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy; +Cc: git

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> +	number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from it, nor
> +	push into it), but is adequate if you are only interested in
> +	the recent history of a large project with a long history.

Ahh, sorry for the noise.  You still say you cannot push _into_ it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-12  5:54 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2013-07-12  7:54   ` Duy Nguyen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Duy Nguyen @ 2013-07-12  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git Mailing List

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +     number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from it, nor
>> +     push into it), but is adequate if you are only interested in
>> +     the recent history of a large project with a long history.
>
> Ahh, sorry for the noise.  You still say you cannot push _into_ it.

Yes, I actually removed that check in the first iteration of this
patch, reasoning that it can't cause any harm and it mostly works. But
"mostly" is not good enough. I will try remove it later if I can make
it always work by extending git protocol a bit (I think full clone
pushing to shallow one can always work. Shallow pushing to shallow,
probably no such guarantee)
--
Duy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-12  5:37 [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
  2013-07-12  5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
  2013-07-12  5:54 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2013-07-13 21:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
  2013-07-14  2:28   ` Duy Nguyen
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2013-07-13 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy; +Cc: git

Hi,

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:

> Since 52fed6e (receive-pack: check connectivity before concluding "git
> push" - 2011-09-02), receive-pack is prepared to deal with broken
> push, a shallow push can't cause any corruption. Update the document
> to reflect that.

Hmm, what happens when pushing to servers without that commit?  Do you
think it should be applied to Debian squeeze for server operators that
haven't upgraded yet to the current stable release?

[...]
> --- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
> @@ -182,11 +182,13 @@ objects from the source repository into a pack in the cloned repository.
>  --depth <depth>::
>  	Create a 'shallow' clone with a history truncated to the
>  	specified number of revisions.  A shallow repository has a
> -	number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from
> -	it, nor push from nor into it), but is adequate if you
> -	are only interested in the recent history of a large project
> -	with a long history, and would want to send in fixes
> -	as patches.
> +	number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from it, nor
> +	push into it), but is adequate if you are only interested in
> +	the recent history of a large project with a long history.
> ++
> +Pushing from a shallow clone should be avoided if the git version on
> +the receiver end is older than v1.7.10, or any other git
> +implementation that does not perform connectivity check.

"git name-rev --tags" tells me 52fed6e was applied during 1.7.8-rc0,
so it might make sense to s/1.7.10/1.7.8/ here.

Aside from that nit,
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Thanks,
Jonathan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-13 21:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
@ 2013-07-14  2:28   ` Duy Nguyen
  2013-07-14 18:52     ` Junio C Hamano
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Duy Nguyen @ 2013-07-14  2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Nieder; +Cc: Git Mailing List

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> Since 52fed6e (receive-pack: check connectivity before concluding "git
>> push" - 2011-09-02), receive-pack is prepared to deal with broken
>> push, a shallow push can't cause any corruption. Update the document
>> to reflect that.
>
> Hmm, what happens when pushing to servers without that commit?  Do you
> think it should be applied to Debian squeeze for server operators that
> haven't upgraded yet to the current stable release?

This is pushing _from_ a shallow repo, where the sender repo's old
objects is a subset of the receiver's. Such a push may be safe even
without the above commit, if I don't miss anything. The commit is in
case I do miss something.

The situation is different when we push _to_ a shallow repo. The
sender in this case may have more old objects than the receiver. The
sender may choose to not send such old objects in the push, not
knowing that the receiver does not have them due to its shallow
nature. So incomplete push and could only be caught be the commit
above.

I don't know about Debian porting strategy, but I think that commit
should be back ported to the stable release. There are more git
clients out there than just C Git and some of them may have bugs. The
commit should help protect the server against buggy clients. If you
back port it, do d21c463 (fetch/receive: remove over-pessimistic
connectivity check - 2012-03-15) too to avoid performance regression
in large pushes/fetches.

>
> [...]
>> --- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
>> @@ -182,11 +182,13 @@ objects from the source repository into a pack in the cloned repository.
>>  --depth <depth>::
>>       Create a 'shallow' clone with a history truncated to the
>>       specified number of revisions.  A shallow repository has a
>> -     number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from
>> -     it, nor push from nor into it), but is adequate if you
>> -     are only interested in the recent history of a large project
>> -     with a long history, and would want to send in fixes
>> -     as patches.
>> +     number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from it, nor
>> +     push into it), but is adequate if you are only interested in
>> +     the recent history of a large project with a long history.
>> ++
>> +Pushing from a shallow clone should be avoided if the git version on
>> +the receiver end is older than v1.7.10, or any other git
>> +implementation that does not perform connectivity check.
>
> "git name-rev --tags" tells me 52fed6e was applied during 1.7.8-rc0,
> so it might make sense to s/1.7.10/1.7.8/ here.

Yeah! I thought "git tag --contains" output was sorted and did not
read past the first few tags. Need to implement version sort for
--tags, or at least commit date sort..

> Aside from that nit,
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
--
Duy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-14  2:28   ` Duy Nguyen
@ 2013-07-14 18:52     ` Junio C Hamano
  2013-07-15  1:01       ` Duy Nguyen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-07-14 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Duy Nguyen; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, Git Mailing List

Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>>
>>> Since 52fed6e (receive-pack: check connectivity before concluding "git
>>> push" - 2011-09-02), receive-pack is prepared to deal with broken
>>> push, a shallow push can't cause any corruption. Update the document
>>> to reflect that.
>>
>> Hmm, what happens when pushing to servers without that commit?  Do you
>> think it should be applied to Debian squeeze for server operators that
>> haven't upgraded yet to the current stable release?
>
> This is pushing _from_ a shallow repo, where the sender repo's old
> objects is a subset of the receiver's.

The "subset" assumption does not necessarily hold, does it?  The
receiver may have rewound its tips and pruned since then.

Also, the sender may have cloned from the receiver (fully) and then
fetched a different history shallowly from elsewhere.  The receiver
may have no commit on that history, including the shallow-bottom.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-14 18:52     ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2013-07-15  1:01       ` Duy Nguyen
  2013-07-15  6:33         ` Duy Nguyen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Duy Nguyen @ 2013-07-15  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, Git Mailing List

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since 52fed6e (receive-pack: check connectivity before concluding "git
>>>> push" - 2011-09-02), receive-pack is prepared to deal with broken
>>>> push, a shallow push can't cause any corruption. Update the document
>>>> to reflect that.
>>>
>>> Hmm, what happens when pushing to servers without that commit?  Do you
>>> think it should be applied to Debian squeeze for server operators that
>>> haven't upgraded yet to the current stable release?
>>
>> This is pushing _from_ a shallow repo, where the sender repo's old
>> objects is a subset of the receiver's.
>
> The "subset" assumption does not necessarily hold, does it?  The
> receiver may have rewound its tips and pruned since then.
>
> Also, the sender may have cloned from the receiver (fully) and then
> fetched a different history shallowly from elsewhere.  The receiver
> may have no commit on that history, including the shallow-bottom.
>

Hmm.. right. And the receiver needs to setup proper graft to seal the
shallow bottom. So it's really not safe to do pushing from a shallow
repo without 52fed6e
--
Duy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-15  1:01       ` Duy Nguyen
@ 2013-07-15  6:33         ` Duy Nguyen
  2013-07-15 15:31           ` Junio C Hamano
  2013-07-15 15:35           ` [PATCH] Revert "git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone" Junio C Hamano
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Duy Nguyen @ 2013-07-15  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, Git Mailing List

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Also, the sender may have cloned from the receiver (fully) and then
>> fetched a different history shallowly from elsewhere.  The receiver
>> may have no commit on that history, including the shallow-bottom.
>>
>
> Hmm.. right. And the receiver needs to setup proper graft to seal the
> shallow bottom. So it's really not safe to do pushing from a shallow
> repo without 52fed6e

Because this makes pushing from a shallow repo fall into "mostly
works" category, I withdraw this patch.
--
Duy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone
  2013-07-15  6:33         ` Duy Nguyen
@ 2013-07-15 15:31           ` Junio C Hamano
  2013-07-15 15:35           ` [PATCH] Revert "git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone" Junio C Hamano
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-07-15 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Duy Nguyen; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, Git Mailing List

Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Also, the sender may have cloned from the receiver (fully) and then
>>> fetched a different history shallowly from elsewhere.  The receiver
>>> may have no commit on that history, including the shallow-bottom.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm.. right. And the receiver needs to setup proper graft to seal the
>> shallow bottom. So it's really not safe to do pushing from a shallow
>> repo without 52fed6e
>
> Because this makes pushing from a shallow repo fall into "mostly
> works" category, I withdraw this patch.

Yeah, "reliably fails when it shouldn't" may be safer than before
that patch, but the fact that you cannot push from a shallow one
still remains, so we probably shouldn't tell the users to use it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Revert "git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone"
  2013-07-15  6:33         ` Duy Nguyen
  2013-07-15 15:31           ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2013-07-15 15:35           ` Junio C Hamano
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2013-07-15 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Duy Nguyen; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, Git Mailing List

This reverts commit dacd2bcc414e0b7aac36aaa400da0a743c4741cc.

"It fails reliably without corrupting the receiving repository when
it should fail" may be better than the situation before the receiving
end was hardened recently, but the fact that sometimes the push does
not go through still remains.  It is better to advice the users that
they cannot push from a shallow repository as a limitation before
they decide to use (or not to use) a shallow clone.
---

 * Unfortunately I thought the documentation update was a
   no-brainer and already applied it, so here is a revert.

 Documentation/git-clone.txt | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
index 85769b8..450f158 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
@@ -182,13 +182,11 @@ objects from the source repository into a pack in the cloned repository.
 --depth <depth>::
 	Create a 'shallow' clone with a history truncated to the
 	specified number of revisions.  A shallow repository has a
-	number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from it, nor
-	push into it), but is adequate if you are only interested in
-	the recent history of a large project with a long history.
-+
-Pushing from a shallow clone should be avoided if the git version on
-the receiver end is older than v1.7.10, or any other git
-implementation that does not perform connectivity check.
+	number of limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from
+	it, nor push from nor into it), but is adequate if you
+	are only interested in the recent history of a large project
+	with a long history, and would want to send in fixes
+	as patches.
 
 --[no-]single-branch::
 	Clone only the history leading to the tip of a single branch,
-- 
1.8.3.2-941-gda9c3c8

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-15 15:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-12  5:37 [PATCH] git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2013-07-12  5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-12  5:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-12  7:54   ` Duy Nguyen
2013-07-13 21:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-07-14  2:28   ` Duy Nguyen
2013-07-14 18:52     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-15  1:01       ` Duy Nguyen
2013-07-15  6:33         ` Duy Nguyen
2013-07-15 15:31           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-15 15:35           ` [PATCH] Revert "git-clone.txt: remove the restriction on pushing from a shallow clone" Junio C Hamano

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).