From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Git <git@vger.kernel.org>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"David Turner" <dturner@twopensource.com>,
"Christian Couder" <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] config: add core.trustmtime
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:12:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACsJy8BZo4hFz+mQKNxrmPQaGforvguFmjL90g=Hf698okFs2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq610j8fzt.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Maybe I'm missing some really common breakage with st_mtime on some
>> system, but having a feature the user explicitly enables turn itself
>> off and doing FS-testing that takes 10 seconds when it's enabled seems
>> like the wrong default to me.
>>
>> We don't do it with core.fileMode, core.ignorecase or core.trustctime
>> or core.symlinks. Do we really need to be treating this differently?
>
> I share the exact thought. I was looking the other way when
> untracked-cache was done originally ;-), and I would also want to
> know the answers to the above questions.
OK I was just paranoid (and having to look at filesystem source code
to determine if it supported this didn't help either). So I guess that
means we can make the test a separate option, only invoked by the
user, then.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 6:35 [RFC/PATCH] config: add core.trustmtime Christian Couder
2015-11-25 9:00 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-11-25 19:51 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-11-26 5:21 ` Christian Couder
2015-11-26 17:53 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-11-27 1:35 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-11-30 19:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-11-30 19:12 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2015-12-01 5:57 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2015-12-02 19:28 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-12-07 5:42 ` Christian Couder
2015-11-25 10:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2015-11-25 10:39 ` Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACsJy8BZo4hFz+mQKNxrmPQaGforvguFmjL90g=Hf698okFs2A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).