From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EADD1F403 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FJBqcIYz"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233264AbiFYQG2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:06:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42040 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233242AbiFYQG1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:06:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4CF6167F6 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id m2so4647225plx.3 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=x3ZEAF+UzAZGp43JeGLS8XeYyDllAZfeml7XL7NB++4=; b=FJBqcIYzA4XmKqY/v1TNIL554hwep5NHqiAfNgBTua+6DY2IWmo9bION47hV3fzelW U6EuoTumpKrJu+vuT3FChqLCvA3PqeLgDpfBiolDTZcPZmWQzwSJFRxfgD97llXbptNR lONBBYg30g/Vsc8o+gLt8EeMsQ//OCLKERGbxg4AXye0JQLgdnt0UMCOi/Nldlyo8sfu 21IYzHC4koiwBC7AHvNInZL9QSYQSASKlTaEnNct9C/TobQ8GNzIT/U0shCDmAEg73EW tPr2MfQResjHazCQV8dwlU4hsJOn8l0t0LO0RfD8JRPxlA3Kp9z/E6YvpWMGmLsygc2B Gt+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x3ZEAF+UzAZGp43JeGLS8XeYyDllAZfeml7XL7NB++4=; b=He6d3LkqDFPoedYJL9A6JO2C4+HAyXRDojvx2YmnrYNSS1Xnr5guUzyXXDBoRCVqhP tkZotzxiFleHwji+5wIeW4SdtmasXwnJ0Vk3iIjt+EJtR+aSlgn+eLLLeVynw81fhLt9 ZpoWKKFr3cqUkjzwuKHrQ6SZpxHxyh8nQOLslsAUxjKxU8+EIZSxKObmmHlpepSQUZtr +Czn8jz0n48e1cPcZniwf4x7YFCI09IFNcJxH/nQ9AkvVSGEhKDFFoTp0pe8Ss/pmiN1 KOrZFIB7uH4U6NzUvhL1F00Fx2uXq6egQOnbGeZzfw0bAYJ/g4WfDlBZZ6mr0flFp2Of /EiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/jvFYZAT+M6QeZ/G3XYjHyNFSihVhQee9NlmWSBAg3NXwAeTHQ txgOSE+PcZ953hW50QACo16NQZYJvhGJ6yoAi7I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tPiLmYpEdMINVNhP/KEUIlOrTJVxc0GakIBTbIxZUSzkz+tZ4enlsnj6esB1kQY0pVm9/hf6V15whXK0wHTaU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32ce:b0:16a:607b:31df with SMTP id i14-20020a17090332ce00b0016a607b31dfmr5235237plr.117.1656173184160; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:06:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Pavel Rappo Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 17:06:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Should `git remote show` display excluded branches as to-be-fetched? To: Jacob Keller Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:34 AM Jacob Keller wrote: > I found a working solution, but I don't really like the > implementation, so perhaps someone with more knowledge of the struct > refspec, struct refspec_item, etc would help me figure out if I am > doing it in a good way. I just posted it. Thanks, Jake. Does Git project have an issue tracker we could enter this bug into?