From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Langhoff Subject: Re: git with large files... Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:42:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86fw8mf3gp.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: David Aguilar , "Randal L. Schwartz" , Darek Bridges , git@vger.kernel.org To: Elia Pinto X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 21 16:43:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SsatW-0000B4-Vc for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:42:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751325Ab2GUOmy (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:42:54 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:60638 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751288Ab2GUOmy (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:42:54 -0400 Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so3656467vbb.19 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:42:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OzLG+QiJ0BRLPVjvZbaIqzokVGgS1dneMNAjerPQYZ0=; b=wqatUIOLMtzMPxtItUVl3SiWvJZklPNB46/0NGODwk5iACyE1BqYTR+fB4/R43j0KN IfgxdGwH33dVh+Pp7xVX6LvHa65rf1jOoupYp6zaZCsCqZNDA8lAaLrROrGdZQl4/C+D 8gVHZIqHYUDpWP4pr7dpAJWxtX5qoTg2IT1XHbknC6LclyHnVoGy+/h4+CPr3ZK17oi3 pOS/flGp0hbCyjOPpc9ueBDAJcRrP+gGRhKO4K0bqqswF2Hi0ncT1yeorI5kxShmKUcQ hOc2CL+qRChQBe7Xq+p7eFCXzDbhJqui/cdqqXdB46PXptMfHV8Z8Jo0BQZxaI6wN+fU +UZw== Received: by 10.52.65.141 with SMTP id x13mr6439701vds.43.1342881773286; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.162.34 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:42:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Elia Pinto wrote: > Well, many folks use puppet in serverless configuration pushing the > manifest from a central git server via cron and applying locally the > configuration fetched. In this sense git IS used for deployement. And, > for a configuration management system as puppet this could be a > sensible thing to do - reduce load, scalability ecc. That's a great thing to know, and timely too. I am looking at Puppet, and worried a bit about reported memory load on the server side (and some rumours of memory footprint issues on the client side too). Can you point me to more information & discussion? thanks! m -- martin.langhoff@gmail.com martin@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff