From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: upload-pack is slow with lots of refs
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 01:47:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACBZZX764OOH82CiLYPr+_qNU65U4Zxuod_7G5ef8yAtHApXog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121003232115.GB11618@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:32:35AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>> > What version of git are you using? In the past year or so, I've made
>> > several tweaks to speed up large numbers of refs, including:
>> >
>> > - cff38a5 (receive-pack: eliminate duplicate .have refs, v1.7.6); note
>> > that this only helps if they are being pulled in by an alternates
>> > repo. And even then, it only helps if they are mostly duplicates;
>> > distinct ones are still O(n^2).
>> >
>> > - 7db8d53 (fetch-pack: avoid quadratic behavior in remove_duplicates)
>> > a0de288 (fetch-pack: avoid quadratic loop in filter_refs)
>> > Both in v1.7.11. I think there is still a potential quadratic loop
>> > in mark_complete()
>> >
>> > - 90108a2 (upload-pack: avoid parsing tag destinations)
>> > 926f1dd (upload-pack: avoid parsing objects during ref advertisement)
>> > Both in v1.7.10. Note that tag objects are more expensive to
>> > advertise than commits, because we have to load and peel them.
>> >
>> > Even with those patches, though, I found that it was something like ~2s
>> > to advertise 100,000 refs.
>>
>> FWIW I bisected between 1.7.9 and 1.7.10 and found that the point at
>> which it went from 1.5/s to 2.5/s upload-pack runs on the pathological
>> git.git repository was none of those, but:
>>
>> ccdc6037fe - parse_object: try internal cache before reading object db
>
> Ah, yeah, I forgot about that one. That implies that you have a lot of
> refs pointing to the same objects (since the benefit of that commit is
> to avoid reading from disk when we have already seen it).
>
> Out of curiosity, what does your repo contain? I saw a lot of speedup
> with that commit because my repos are big object stores, where we have
> the same duplicated tag refs for every fork of the repo.
Things are much faster with your monkeypatch, got up to around 10
runs/s.
The repository mainly contains a lot of git-deploy[1] generated tags
which are added for every rollout to several subsystems.
Of the ~50k references in the repo 75% point to a commit that no other
reference points to. Around 98% of the references are annotated tags,
the rest are branches.
1. https://github.com/git-deploy/git-deploy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-04 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 12:36 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-10-03 13:06 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-10-03 18:03 ` Jeff King
2012-10-03 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-03 18:55 ` Jeff King
2012-10-03 19:41 ` Shawn Pearce
2012-10-03 20:13 ` Jeff King
2012-10-04 21:52 ` Sascha Cunz
2012-10-05 0:20 ` Jeff King
2012-10-05 6:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-05 16:57 ` Shawn Pearce
2012-10-08 15:05 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-09 6:46 ` Shawn Pearce
2012-10-09 20:30 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-09 20:46 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-03 20:16 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-10-03 21:20 ` Jeff King
2012-10-03 22:15 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-10-03 23:15 ` Jeff King
2012-10-03 23:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-10-04 7:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] optimizing upload-pack ref peeling Jeff King
2012-10-04 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] peel_ref: use faster deref_tag_noverify Jeff King
2012-10-04 18:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-04 8:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] peel_ref: do not return a null sha1 Jeff King
2012-10-04 18:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-04 8:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] peel_ref: check object type before loading Jeff King
2012-10-04 19:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-04 19:41 ` Jeff King
2012-10-04 20:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-04 21:59 ` Jeff King
2012-10-04 8:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] upload-pack: use peel_ref for ref advertisements Jeff King
2012-10-04 8:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] optimizing upload-pack ref peeling Jeff King
2012-10-04 9:01 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-10-04 12:14 ` Nazri Ramliy
2012-10-03 22:32 ` upload-pack is slow with lots of refs Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-10-03 23:21 ` Jeff King
2012-10-03 23:47 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2012-10-03 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACBZZX764OOH82CiLYPr+_qNU65U4Zxuod_7G5ef8yAtHApXog@mail.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--subject='Re: upload-pack is slow with lots of refs' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).