From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4176C1F8CF for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751596AbdFHG2l (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 02:28:41 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]:38486 "EHLO mail-it0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751190AbdFHG2k (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 02:28:40 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r63so15770050itc.1 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 23:28:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cf2PopdHZFMOF7EMTs+LKg4y374te+zx2UGVznMX+4E=; b=DTBAbv69L38nBvwSVXDXTpDJ7oukhUC7g2hvKW2M98bjQFaEvhCQXyyAjNZvn/6DHy Kp3ToqwLvgtz2ZRm0qVwWUk440J0ET0BS5LJJcaZ+59pifmkkA2mZvHfgZogUxXCkPEO okovtRq8WKwRbuWLszrqEcMOdbowheG/QbykMyfG1ST+mLJ/6+FdmqmHD0csFesl0CdI jek7xUD0eO5GFtEWSkznN9b9qX8kY/QOUc1A/wXg2NYEmUDDa3f6oQoPQlmjEC+WqVLt CFrzFdmXdHfYuoUpIJq13oMbKSfrRBpraJ0+2k+gasyhhT/MIGgteD6kg33gjmr1XTJ3 vS9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cf2PopdHZFMOF7EMTs+LKg4y374te+zx2UGVznMX+4E=; b=h8+oDBr6ZU9jB0WRnl3QtChL75hIDfmfJmij0gYJitLJxVTS9TDlws6iCiG3/EL9Et kw26NX2W6C7eGwrGBN/bHVR5lDcpN6dEgj+yH7mjQo/5tyzlAkCDVr731Af3PUNi3+8N 9H52K8nOaOxls8fTSqm3/MNK/PLMRTVjlPxR/Uvw5K1WY9yxgDGIe3vV/rGbFxTX0wUS vylR5cI9/EbdBZ8nhlCk5YgpZznZQn6iboqvZn0gJBCV1QH9egAXD857bRVsc+lstcBk V6jSRr6u5lk47/3EOhyWF9G8WTKS3qOUweFmOatkfQHXV4wewh/21o4fYF4ekVOX6UED LRbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBJrzXD5EBEzxbjRqc/VOfaHCWVB+UeoUC8sFbU3c5kCKBWj187 jMLzy7HVAOBTw/X5yOOgvwIyDz1TwQ== X-Received: by 10.36.233.198 with SMTP id f189mr3921410ith.94.1496903320027; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 23:28:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.3.231 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:28:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: send-email: Net::SMTP::SSL failure To: Samuel Lijin Cc: Liam Breck , Git Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Samuel Lijin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:43 PM, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason > wrote: >> Ah, so you installed Net::SSLeay via CPAN, and then upgraded your Arch >> openssl, breaking the CPAN-built *.so object? >> >>> Agreed that send-email should be report errors properly. It's a rather >>> essential tool. >> >> Indeed, do you get a meaningful error if you apply my patch? > > FWIW I'm on Arch as well and am getting what I assume is a related error: > > SSLeay.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got > handshake key 0xdb80080, needed 0xde00080) > > The last patch I sent out was on 5/23, and I just ran a system upgrade > today (only one I've done since then), which presumably is what > "broke" send-email. I used CPAN to install Net::SMTP::SSL, > Mime::Base64, and Authen::SASL; I assume that Net::SSLeay is installed > as a dependency of one of the three (presumably the first)? > > I know Net::SSLeay isn't controlled by Arch's package manager: > > $ perldoc -l Net::SSLeay > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/Net/SSLeay.pod > $ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/Net/SSLeay.pod > error: No package owns /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/Net/SSLeay.pod > > =C3=86var's patch unfortunately does not fix or change anything for me. It doesn't fix anything, it should make you get a better error message when the thing does break, i.e. not an "Attempt to reload" error, doesn't that happen? What error do you get with/without my patch? > Liam: when you say "uninstall" /usr/{lib,share}/perl5/site_perl/*, do > you just mean rm -rf?