From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75531F600 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751642AbdGWUcf (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jul 2017 16:32:35 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:37780 "EHLO mail-it0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751584AbdGWUcc (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jul 2017 16:32:32 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id v127so26535221itd.0 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 13:32:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+3Q+WKCVsee7TBoe8S+5b6OjKbIyL2qke+8HewBx7fM=; b=j416z5FcSht35Y/C+nZWylHgmVQxYpDQ+tmiLuUY7qvyZTR9h6x6UczWZyPEF5/QIs HvyMYn8lYo/y+qWwuZbTzqs5AdHqQyEq49RptgDDvg9pk+fwfz1V5gN7NNfBvv+7rT+o NpifMelz1Q382sggbgTNxh+9s4E/XPnP723vAfkT1x0flmnGvWYAWheSy8W2Dug6ZhwH U1Hor3C/ototYckyEB4pESKl6anh6Jt+iMo4Uyaw2nPladgeji9moRTNWCM+BotJrChd OFDkY1Z79ku0AeNaq17sJnx4Vm8YrPesmgWi8LEYE+qKvHZOjpoosTwsi3JiXdfaGn8w gV/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+3Q+WKCVsee7TBoe8S+5b6OjKbIyL2qke+8HewBx7fM=; b=g2gUm80tLdlxyfplmG/An8263t6mOj0AbJJ7n6OYKSR4xEqwvwI43fKMAvASwWBo0R xjNc6SV/XGSct/bfWTTLS/8l84tMQUvT4jYHcSTNMfC4cdn5j0esxVdPe2E3tCJLtJmn pl5uMyD3sVYiAbb+hX5deUTPZ9T43S22XZpBDuRzPYRjSMwnfJ+lwFpSYhX+WOCXI6Mt l8zD6nOpFmqECKwkSRCbOcq+qqFs7vFjVBSDTLsNaEOOYPWyvdRjonU4DR28IY5sBxsq C+E89h6JzBbvCnWe4u/iGtnIQbLzaQIuPZY/StB8XOHb+mfyFlP2GeJnx+Ub5x64Le0A uH+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113zvKr2y5X5qRMagDwFRpoo5thr9uTzrtgLdPUNyN87I91ILXzF YU8sQaom7ZGD8X0lQdiX5Px9ARRGCQ== X-Received: by 10.36.16.137 with SMTP id 131mr5023837ity.11.1500841951657; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 13:32:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.155.195 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 13:32:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 22:32:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: reftable [v3]: new ref storage format To: Shawn Pearce Cc: git , Jeff King , Michael Haggerty , Junio C Hamano , David Borowitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Shawn Pearce wrote: > 3rd iteration of the reftable storage format. > > You can read a rendered version of this here: > https://googlers.googlesource.com/sop/jgit/+/reftable/Documentation/technical/reftable.md > > Significant changes from v2: > - efficient lookup by SHA-1 for allow-tip-sha1-in-want. > - type 0x4 for FETCH_HEAD, MERGE_HEAD. > - file size up (27.7 M in v1, 34.4 M in v3) I had some feedback on v2 here which still applies: https://public-inbox.org/git/87k234tti7.fsf@gmail.com/ It would be good to either get a reply to that, or if you don't think it's sensible for whatever reason and left it out of v3 have a "feedback received but discarded for " in these summaries as you're sending new versions. Aside from the mail I sent I think that would be very useful in general if there's been any other such feedback (I honestly don't know if there has, I haven't been following this actively).