From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Renaud Subject: Re: The GitTogether Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:43:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5059CC01.2080205@alum.mit.edu> <505B662B.2040709@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Shawn Pearce , Sebastian Schuberth , Michael Haggerty , Scott Chacon , git list , Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , Heiko Voigt , Michael J Gruber , Jens Lehmann , Thomas Rast To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 21 18:43:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TF6KY-0008Q5-Tu for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:43:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756525Ab2IUQnq (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:43:46 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:41663 "EHLO mail-oa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756407Ab2IUQnp (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:43:45 -0400 Received: by oago6 with SMTP id o6so3529995oag.19 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mEInZYk7azCZYQGmkNen25J4IJN/gi7oVWPJtvc1sqs=; b=SBIpvQ78lCmc4AMLRoa1BqftxZJyGqxS4HUcFtvyx8pJQ84yKtx9Fc0gfMtb/t/OrA 5VY3i2c4DQWX+Ex1PA+vKEuRsEUA2euxStWNHbxUKfcwO9AFkMjISEKG+PikRtUWDiyD gPXfXpWeFbwbtzd/GQlASO907JijsMra7X7sycUD2smnIpXHnrx2NmjjDjgyy8mj4S7x PjSKsOIbck7RXomBz8v2mqztQh2lt0/i/AjWRFz1aEva6nBy3kRrk/sxrofMGC/5zZ1b E5pzXgUeChpfjux+I47XghSpVXzTMI068/EInwwKxm1YNkDuDe2tzqYqcFBbZqxrr/7r io+Q== Received: by 10.60.7.104 with SMTP id i8mr4224865oea.31.1348245824765; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.166.1 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Guys, Are we still talking of having two disconnected events for Git, one for core devs and one for users? -Patrick On 21 September 2012 11:23, Christian Couder wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Shawn Pearce wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Christian Couder >> >>> It is sad that people who know what is or what is not happening are >>> not taking care of letting people on this list know about it... >> >> I did not post to this mailing list about the Gerrit Code Review user >> summit because I did not consider it to be on-topic to this list. We >> do not normally discuss Gerrit Code Review here. Most users and >> developers on this list only work on git-core (aka git.git aka the >> thing Junio maintains). Gerrit... is a different animal. :-) > > It would have been nice if you had said earlier on this list/thread > that Google chose to host a Gerrit user summit instead of the > traditional GitTogether. > >> If you are interested in attending, it is Saturday November 10th and >> Sunday 11th in Mountain View, CA. The user summit is invite only, but >> you may request an invitation at http://goo.gl/5HYlB. > > Thanks for the information. I think it is indeed interesting to know about it. > >> I have no further information about the potential GitTogether than >> anyone else. IIRC there is a suggestion in this thread about hosting >> something in the EU sometime in early next year, with someone at >> GitHub acting as organizer. > > Before I posted what you wrote on the Gerrit mailing list, the only > information people had on this list/thread was about a GitHub proposal > to organize 2 different GitTogether: "the developer-centric one in > Berlin > in early October (a few weeks before the Mentor Summit this time) and > the user one in January or February of next year." > >> Google chose to run only a Gerrit user summit this year because of the >> mix of attendees at the last GitTogether. The group was about 60-70% >> Gerrit users/admins. We felt it was time to host something specific >> for that audience. > > Gerrit users/admins are probably Git users/admins too. But anyway, it > is ok of course for Google to organize whatever it prefers. > I hope GitHub will do as good a job running a GitTogether as Google did. > > Thanks, > Christian.