git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
To: Leif Gruenwoldt <leifer@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andreas T.Auer" <andreas.t.auer_gtml_37453@ursus.ath.cx>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] add update to branch support for "floating submodules"
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:56:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABURp0rFOGQ9kAbAn65W3UAHTWbk5prH7spjJnFvL5fqzbFp1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALFF=ZRB7qjj7VMhzr12ySdHmZsySoqceu5brFht8rX1+W3NPg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Leif Gruenwoldt <leifer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Andreas T.Auer
> <andreas.t.auer_gtml_37453@ursus.ath.cx> wrote:
>
>> The next question is: Wouldn't you like to have the new stable branch only
>> pulled in, when the projectX (as the superproject) is currently on that new
>> development branch (maybe master)?
>>
>> But if you checkout that fixed released version 1.2.9.8, wouldn't it be
>> better that in that case the gitlinked version of the submodule is checked
>> out instead of some unrelated new version? I mean, when the gitlinks are
>> tracked with the projectX commits, this should work well.
>>
>> And what about a maintenance branch, which is not a fixed version but a
>> quite stable branch which should only have bugfixes. Shouldn't the auto-pull
>> be disabled in that case, too?
>>
>> I think the "auto-pull" behavior should depend on the currently checked out
>> branch. So the configuration options should allow the definition of one or
>> more mappings.
>
> Yes. I think you nailed it. The floating behaviour would best be
> configured per branch.

Yes, I think you nailed it too.  I've been thinking the same thing for
a while now, but I didn't know how to express it completely.  Some of
the discussion on here last week gelled the last bits in my mind.

To wit, I think I would want something like this in my project:

Use gitlinks when the superproject HEAD is one of these:
    refs/heads/maint/*
    refs/heads/svn/*     (historic branches)
    refs/tags/*
    <SHA1> (detached)

Float on the rest, using the branch given in .gitmodules (which may be
* to mean "use the same branch as the superproject".)

But maybe it is foolish of me to keep branches where I really want
lightweight tags.  If so, I could get away with this:

   Float if .git/HEAD begins with "refs/heads"
   Else, use the SHA1.


> An aside. Would this mean a "git pull" on the product repo would
> automatically do a pull (git submodule update) on the submodule too?

Good question.

I want to say "eventually, but not yet."  But someone else may
disagree.  "git pull --recurse-submodules=yes" does not do this yet.
A separate git-submodule-update is still required.  But I think this
is a separate issue from floating submodules.

Phil

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-12 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-09 17:40 [RFC/PATCH] add update to branch support for "floating submodules" Heiko Voigt
2011-11-09 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-29 22:08   ` Heiko Voigt
2011-12-10  5:50     ` Leif Gruenwoldt
2011-12-10  6:19       ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-12-10  6:30       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-10 15:27         ` Leif Gruenwoldt
2011-12-12 15:34           ` Andreas T.Auer
2011-12-12 18:04             ` Leif Gruenwoldt
2011-12-12 18:42               ` Andreas T.Auer
2011-12-12 19:13                 ` Leif Gruenwoldt
2011-12-12 22:31                   ` Jens Lehmann
2011-12-12 22:56                   ` Phil Hord [this message]
2011-12-13 15:35                     ` Marc Branchaud
2011-12-13 21:19                       ` Jens Lehmann
2011-12-13 22:42                         ` Marc Branchaud
2011-12-12 19:36           ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-13 14:17             ` Phil Hord
2011-12-13 21:09               ` Jens Lehmann
2012-01-30 21:15                 ` Phil Hord
2012-01-31 20:55                   ` Jens Lehmann
2012-01-31 22:50                     ` Phil Hord
2012-02-01 22:37                       ` Jens Lehmann
2012-02-06 17:31                         ` Phil Hord
2012-02-06 21:32                           ` Jens Lehmann
2011-12-13  0:12           ` Brandon Casey
2011-12-10 14:16   ` Gioele Barabucci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABURp0rFOGQ9kAbAn65W3UAHTWbk5prH7spjJnFvL5fqzbFp1w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=phil.hord@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.t.auer_gtml_37453@ursus.ath.cx \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=leifer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).