From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>
Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] merge-tree: support saving merge messages to a separate file
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 08:51:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPp-BH4okfDXVC418HwfHVR2_NtbKFBOfyYGZ9mWnABMzSruw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220103123114.uuvpk4nley22gfkg@fs>
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 4:31 AM Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de> wrote:
>
> On 31.12.2021 05:04, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> >From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> >
> >When running `git merge-tree --real`, we previously would only return an
> >exit status reflecting the cleanness of a merge, and print out the
> >toplevel tree of the resulting merge. Merges also have informational
> >messages, ("Auto-merging <PATH>", "CONFLICT (content): ...", "CONFLICT
> >(file/directory)", etc.) In fact, when non-content conflicts occur
> >(such as file/directory, modify/delete, add/add with differing modes,
> >rename/rename (1to2), etc.), these informational messages are often the
> >only notification since these conflicts are not representable in the
> >contents of the file.
> >
> >Add a --messages option which names a file so that callers can request
> >these messages be recorded somewhere.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> >---
> > Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt | 6 ++++--
> > builtin/merge-tree.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > t/t4301-merge-tree-real.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
> >index 5823938937f..4d5857b390b 100644
> >--- a/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
> >+++ b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
> >@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ git-merge-tree - Perform merge without touching index or working tree
> > SYNOPSIS
> > --------
> > [verse]
> >-'git merge-tree' --real <branch1> <branch2>
> >+'git merge-tree' --real [--messages=<file>] <branch1> <branch2>
> > 'git merge-tree' <base-tree> <branch1> <branch2>
> >
> > DESCRIPTION
> >@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ The first form will merge the two branches, doing a full recursive
> > merge with rename detection. If the merge is clean, the exit status
> > will be `0`, and if the merge has conflicts, the exit status will be
> > `1`. The output will consist solely of the resulting toplevel tree
> >-(which may have files including conflict markers).
> >+(which may have files including conflict markers). With `--messages`,
> >+it will write any informational messages (such as "Auto-merging
> >+<path>" and conflict notices) to the given file.
> >
> > The second form is meant for backward compatibility and will only do a
> > trival merge. It reads three tree-ish, and outputs trivial merge
> >diff --git a/builtin/merge-tree.c b/builtin/merge-tree.c
> >index c5757bed5bb..47deef0b199 100644
> >--- a/builtin/merge-tree.c
> >+++ b/builtin/merge-tree.c
> >@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ static int trivial_merge(const char *base,
> >
> > struct merge_tree_options {
> > int real;
> >+ char *messages_file;
> > };
> >
> > static int real_merge(struct merge_tree_options *o,
> >@@ -442,8 +443,15 @@ static int real_merge(struct merge_tree_options *o,
> > */
> >
> > merge_incore_recursive(&opt, merge_bases, parent1, parent2, &result);
> >+
> >+ if (o->messages_file) {
> >+ FILE *fp = xfopen(o->messages_file, "w");
> >+ merge_display_update_messages(&opt, &result, fp);
> >+ fclose(fp);
>
> I don't know enough about how merge-ort works internally, but it looks to me
> like at this point the merge already happened and we just didn't clean up
> (finalize) yet. It feels wrong to die() at this point just because we can't
> open messages_file.
Yes, the merge already happened; there now exists a new toplevel tree
(that nothing references). I'm not sure I understand what's wrong
with die'ing here, though. I can't tell if you want to defer the
die-ing until later, or just avoid the die-ing and return some kind of
success despite failing to complete what the user requested.
>
> >+ }
> > printf("%s\n", oid_to_hex(&result.tree->object.oid));
> >- merge_switch_to_result(&opt, NULL, &result, 0, 0);
> >+
> >+ merge_finalize(&opt, &result);
> > return result.clean ? 0 : 1;
> > }
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-03 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-31 5:03 [PATCH 0/8] RFC: Server side merges (no ref updating, no commit creating, no touching worktree or index) Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-12-31 5:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] merge-tree: rename merge_trees() to trivial_merge_trees() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-12-31 5:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] merge-tree: move logic for existing merge into new function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-01 20:11 ` Johannes Altmanninger
2022-01-01 20:17 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] merge-tree: add option parsing and initial shell for real merge function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 4/8] merge-tree: implement real merges Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-01 20:08 ` Johannes Altmanninger
2022-01-01 21:11 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-03 12:23 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 16:37 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 5/8] merge-ort: split out a separate display_update_messages() function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-03 12:15 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 12:25 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 6/8] merge-ort: allow update messages to be written to different file stream Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-01 20:08 ` Johannes Altmanninger
2022-01-01 20:19 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 7/8] merge-tree: support saving merge messages to a separate file Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-03 12:31 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 16:51 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2022-01-03 17:22 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 19:46 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-04 13:05 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 12:35 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 16:55 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 8/8] merge-tree: provide an easy way to access which files have conflicts Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] RFC: Server side merges (no ref updating, no commit creating, no touching worktree or index) Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] merge-tree: rename merge_trees() to trivial_merge_trees() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] merge-tree: move logic for existing merge into new function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] merge-tree: add option parsing and initial shell for real merge function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] merge-tree: implement real merges Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-07 15:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 17:26 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 18:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 19:15 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-11 13:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 18:12 ` Christian Couder
2022-01-07 19:09 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] merge-ort: split out a separate display_update_messages() function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] merge-ort: allow update messages to be written to different file stream Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] merge-tree: support saving merge messages to a separate file Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-07 18:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-08 1:02 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] merge-tree: provide an easy way to access which files have conflicts Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 19:09 ` Ramsay Jones
2022-01-05 19:17 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 19:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 22:12 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-22 13:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-08 1:28 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-22 13:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-05 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] RFC: Server side merges (no ref updating, no commit creating, no touching worktree or index) Junio C Hamano
2022-01-05 22:35 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 18:46 ` Christian Couder
2022-01-07 19:59 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 21:26 ` René Scharfe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABPp-BH4okfDXVC418HwfHVR2_NtbKFBOfyYGZ9mWnABMzSruw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=fs@gigacodes.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).