git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: 2.18.0 Regression: packing performance and effectiveness
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:42:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPp-BGE0yAgtOkSC0jUhq3M3ynX9pks5VnjVB_WMkYUVdirzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180719151640.GA24997@duynguyen.home>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:16 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 07:57:37AM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> I thought 2M was generous but I was obviously wrong. I'd like to see
>> the biggest delta size in this pack and whether it's still reasonable
>> to increase OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS. But if it's very close to 4GB limit
>> then we could just store 64-bit delta size in a separate array.
>
> I realize now that these two options don't have to be mutually
> exclusive and I should provide a good fallback in terms of performance
> anyway.
>
> So Elijah, could you try this patch and see if performance and pack
> size go back to 1.7.0? I can write proper commit message and test
> support later if it proves a good improvement.

Thanks for the quick turnaround.  Unfortunately, I have some bad news.
With this patch, I get the following:

$ /usr/bin/time -f 'MaxRSS:%M Time:%e' git gc --aggressive
Enumerating objects: 4460703, done.
Counting objects: 100% (4460703/4460703), done.
Delta compression using up to 40 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (3807140/3807140), done.
Writing objects: 100% (4460703/4460703), done.
Total 4460703 (delta 2831383), reused 1587071 (delta 0)
error: failed to unpack compressed delta at offset 183854150 from
.git/objects/pack/pack-30d4f0b0e5a03dc91a658a0586f4e74cdf4a94d6.pack
fatal: packed object 20ce811e53dabbb8ef9368c108cbbdfa65639c03 (stored
in .git/objects/pack/pack-30d4f0b0e5a03dc91a658a0586f4e74cdf4a94d6.pack)
is corrupt
error: failed to run prune
MaxRSS:40025196 Time:2531.52


It looks like this comes after it deleted the old packs, so running
git fsck afterwards prints lots of errors.  Just in case they're
helpful at all, there are 26 "error: failed to unpack compressed delta
at offset..." messages, 26 "error: cannot unpack ... from ... at
offset ..." messages, 17 "error: failed to read delta base object..."
messages, 7 "broken link from ... to ..." messages, four missing
blobs, and three missing trees.

(This was run on a copy of the repo, so no harm done; I can still use
the original.)


> -- 8< --
> diff --git a/builtin/pack-objects.c b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> index ebc8cefb53..7f3546057d 100644
> --- a/builtin/pack-objects.c
> +++ b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> @@ -2023,10 +2023,6 @@ static int try_delta(struct unpacked *trg, struct unpacked *src,
>         delta_buf = create_delta(src->index, trg->data, trg_size, &delta_size, max_size);
>         if (!delta_buf)
>                 return 0;
> -       if (delta_size >= (1U << OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS)) {
> -               free(delta_buf);
> -               return 0;
> -       }
>
>         if (DELTA(trg_entry)) {
>                 /* Prefer only shallower same-sized deltas. */
> diff --git a/pack-objects.c b/pack-objects.c
> index 92708522e7..191ed45faf 100644
> --- a/pack-objects.c
> +++ b/pack-objects.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ struct object_entry *packlist_alloc(struct packing_data *pdata,
>
>                 if (!pdata->in_pack_by_idx)
>                         REALLOC_ARRAY(pdata->in_pack, pdata->nr_alloc);
> +               if (pdata->delta_size)
> +                       REALLOC_ARRAY(pdata->delta_size, pdata->nr_alloc);
>         }
>
>         new_entry = pdata->objects + pdata->nr_objects++;
> @@ -177,3 +179,17 @@ struct object_entry *packlist_alloc(struct packing_data *pdata,
>
>         return new_entry;
>  }
> +
> +void oe_prepare_delta_size_array(struct packing_data *pack)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * nr_alloc, not nr_objects to align with realloc() strategy in
> +        * packlist_alloc()
> +        */
> +       ALLOC_ARRAY(pack->delta_size, pack->nr_alloc);
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < pack->nr_objects; i++)
> +               pack->delta_size[i] = pack->objects[i].delta_size_;
> +}
> diff --git a/pack-objects.h b/pack-objects.h
> index edf74dabdd..978500e474 100644
> --- a/pack-objects.h
> +++ b/pack-objects.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>   * above this limit. Don't lower it too much.
>   */
>  #define OE_SIZE_BITS           31
> -#define OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS     20
> +#define OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS     21
>
>  /*
>   * State flags for depth-first search used for analyzing delta cycles.
> @@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct object_entry {
>                                      * uses the same base as me
>                                      */
>         unsigned delta_size_:OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS; /* delta data size (uncompressed) */
> -       unsigned delta_size_valid:1;
>         unsigned in_pack_idx:OE_IN_PACK_BITS;   /* already in pack */
>         unsigned z_delta_size:OE_Z_DELTA_BITS;
>         unsigned type_valid:1;
> @@ -130,6 +129,7 @@ struct packing_data {
>         uint32_t index_size;
>
>         unsigned int *in_pack_pos;
> +       unsigned long *delta_size;
>
>         /*
>          * Only one of these can be non-NULL and they have different
> @@ -330,20 +330,27 @@ static inline void oe_set_size(struct packing_data *pack,
>  static inline unsigned long oe_delta_size(struct packing_data *pack,
>                                           const struct object_entry *e)
>  {
> -       if (e->delta_size_valid)
> +       if (!pack->delta_size)
>                 return e->delta_size_;
> -       return oe_size(pack, e);
> +       return pack->delta_size[e - pack->objects];
>  }
>
> +void oe_prepare_delta_size_array(struct packing_data *pack);
>  static inline void oe_set_delta_size(struct packing_data *pack,
>                                      struct object_entry *e,
>                                      unsigned long size)
>  {
>         e->delta_size_ = size;
> -       e->delta_size_valid = e->delta_size_ == size;
> -       if (!e->delta_size_valid && size != oe_size(pack, e))
> -               BUG("this can only happen in check_object() "
> -                   "where delta size is the same as entry size");
> +       if (!pack->delta_size && e->delta_size_ == size)
> +               return;
> +       /*
> +        * We have had at least one delta size exceeding OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS
> +        * limit. delta_size_ will not be used anymore. All delta sizes are now
> +        * from the delta_size[] array.
> +        */
> +       if (!pack->delta_size)
> +               oe_prepare_delta_size_array(pack);
> +       pack->delta_size[e - pack->objects] = size;
>  }
>
>  #endif
> -- 8< --
>
>
> --
> Duy

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-19 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-18 22:51 2.18.0 Regression: packing performance and effectiveness Elijah Newren
2018-07-18 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH] fix-v1: revert "pack-objects: shrink delta_size field in struct object_entry" Elijah Newren
2018-07-18 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH] fix-v2: make OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS a bit bigger Elijah Newren
2018-07-19  5:41 ` 2.18.0 Regression: packing performance and effectiveness Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19  5:49   ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 15:27   ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-19 15:43     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19  5:44 ` Jeff King
2018-07-19  5:57   ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 15:16     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 16:42       ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2018-07-19 17:23         ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 17:31           ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 18:24             ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 19:17               ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 23:11               ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-20  5:28                 ` Jeff King
2018-07-20  5:30                   ` Jeff King
2018-07-20  5:47                   ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-20 17:21                   ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-19 17:04       ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 19:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-19 19:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-20 15:39 ` [PATCH] pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large deltas Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-07-20 17:40   ` Jeff King
2018-07-21  4:23     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 21:37       ` Jeff King
2018-07-20 17:43   ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-20 23:52     ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-21  4:07       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-21  7:08         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-21  4:47     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-21  6:56       ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-21  7:14         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-22  6:22       ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-22  6:49         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 12:34     ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-23 15:50       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-22  8:04   ` [PATCH v2] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-07-23 18:04     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-23 18:38       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 18:49         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 21:30           ` Jeff King
2018-07-26  8:12     ` Johannes Sixt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABPp-BGE0yAgtOkSC0jUhq3M3ynX9pks5VnjVB_WMkYUVdirzA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).