From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AE81F5AE for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229728AbhGUAFA (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:05:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40088 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229506AbhGUAEv (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:04:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B269C061574 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id o72-20020a9d224e0000b02904bb9756274cso583167ota.6 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:45:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=L8wEwAv9wKMsC9/C9taGHPwwNX0Jjyq1W+cR5/2pDd0=; b=Gb3jEX3DDvaip1CY7CG4RKiVtbMjv91E8lr2FbjIO2E8R6e7aRdfUuNwrC8C763peA jhwlO1/fJr4NaQgn8XWaOU4WLKww03eNlBQAaI/Lu61BW1toAYYMUOm57UofRqA/11JU T/c3E5+ORUoFAuKFEI1M9bqITMuFu8xV5NEJLXGsdtNkGYtcRwuVSlMTupiuV82Y1SmZ FzcP2Y8IOc3HrqTxKv++nMekiHGdI2Gj88C+iauZ01SE4GNminqo/JJ7VdDPWo53Q/7H kYbjehnemmIT9M9Dl3u9oF9+dexzAIOq9V6eY7WomGZigd0C43OJVnemwmNDSvdO4qzb OWIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=L8wEwAv9wKMsC9/C9taGHPwwNX0Jjyq1W+cR5/2pDd0=; b=q2ZbRp3A7yuVxs+ff4zdWvTP/R+Jri+Vzv1TtuYKmrtgCUiQTeCiFYI+6nglg4fg20 +qC4y5/nMfiTo2tX2XFy5xG6ckvtwZDanoyTPy6emj6nNqHnvr/aSbR9OY5WQIcP6YRi bjdlhPznZVbjdIWvMFTwId/aUn5IA68E6I0Lbf8Dapm0iaSCyknNjGz1wjGIuV55KV+r QbefBDrByPcvxuPJwkt9PECj3OGDRaBEUfGVnJUBWjJpMQE26qr+uAWznnEJJ5HdtK6r MxfudvZP7TZZ8Lq/idN+vt+zlOXq/1dQR50SMb9EJHSj+A7oOvw8bFiddYBX4l/HPuM9 2pCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dXCfxQGcrca+F6jsmS3hbIjWpV/3fgRe+Y+Qn5JNX7J83AmG8 RvKUKxtfip0AN3dwRuEqtayMCsomPeeNgywNrRE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXcn3hIPNYwlP5cuW3YQQAKlWFpx7pv476xtg9KppEcW/JH8VBrvLFKTMLSXtiSsGMFiJR+cuKxoF0kHzBnGs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:78c:: with SMTP id w12mr20814282ots.162.1626828328845; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:45:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <329802382bfa24241c2333bd38284aa77e3eb9f0.1626536508.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Elijah Newren Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:45:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] t7601: add tests of interactions with multiple merge heads and config To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget , Git Mailing List , Alex Henrie , Son Luong Ngoc , Matthias Baumgarten , Eric Sunshine , =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: > > "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" writes: > > > +test_expect_failure 'Multiple heads does not warn about fast forwarding' ' > > + git reset --hard c1 && > > + git pull . c2 c3 2>err && > > + test_i18ngrep ! "Pulling without specifying how to reconcile" err > > +' > > This does not look like "warning about fast-forwarding". > > But more importantly, are we sure we want to expect this outcome? > > We are at c1 and try to integrate with c2 and c3 at the same time, > neither of which is a descendant of c1. > > We know that the only possible action is to create an octopus in > this case, and that it is pretty much fundamental (i.e. it is not > like "rebase" with further development will be able to handle this > case). I however do not know if it is also obvious to total newbies > who haven't even chosen between merge and rebase. I can see them > complaining "why didn't I get asked to choose between rebase and > merge" if we went ahead and created an octopus merge, especially the > ones who would choose pull.rebase=yes once they learned Git a bit > more. That's a fair point; I'll modify the test accordingly (and update the description). > > +test_expect_success 'Cannot fast-forward with multiple heads' ' > > + git reset --hard c0 && > > + test_must_fail git -c pull.ff=only pull . c1 c2 c3 2>err && > > + test_i18ngrep ! "Pulling without specifying how to reconcile" err && > > + test_i18ngrep "Not possible to fast-forward, aborting" err > > +' > > This one looks sensible to me. > > > +test_expect_success 'Cannot rebase with multiple heads' ' > > + git reset --hard c0 && > > + test_must_fail git -c pull.rebase=true pull . c1 c2 c3 2>err && > > + test_i18ngrep ! "Pulling without specifying how to reconcile" err && > > + test_i18ngrep "Cannot rebase onto multiple branches." err > > +' > > This one, too. > > Thanks.