From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin Melka" <martin.melka@gmail.com>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Samuel Lijin" <sxlijin@gmail.com>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dir: move setting of nested_repo next to its actual usage
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:45:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPp-BFbXJRW38CeGy78b22MfZ8cNizexCM-+n-ODqy+fOo2uw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d9a6047-26be-ff78-cf1a-9f2b35f927e0@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 7:33 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2020 5:03 PM, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > dir.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> > index 225f0bc082..ef3307718a 100644
> > --- a/dir.c
> > +++ b/dir.c
> > @@ -1659,7 +1659,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
> > const char *dirname, int len, int baselen, int excluded,
> > const struct pathspec *pathspec)
> > {
> > - int nested_repo = 0;
> > + int nested_repo;
> >
> > /* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */
> > switch (directory_exists_in_index(istate, dirname, len-1)) {
> > @@ -1670,6 +1670,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
> > return path_none;
> >
> > case index_nonexistent:
> > + nested_repo = 0;
>
> I had to look at this code in-full from en/fill-directory-fixes-more to
> be sure that this case was the only use of nested_repo. However, I found
> that this switch statement is unnecessarily complicated. By converting
> the switch to multiple "if" statements, I noticed that the third case
> actually has a "break" statement that can lead to the final "fourth case"
> outside the switch statement.
>
> Hopefully the patch below is a worthy replacement for this one:
>
> -->8--
>
> From b5c04e6e028cb6c7f9e78fbdd2182383d928fe6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:28:39 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] dir: refactor treat_directory to clarify variable scope
>
> The nested_repo variable in treat_directory() is created and
> initialized before a multi-case switch statement, but is only
> used by one case. In fact, this switch is very asymmetrical,
> as the first two cases are simple but the third is more
> complicated than the rest of the method.
>
> Extract the switch statement into a series of "if" statements.
> This simplifies the trivial cases, while highlighting the fact
> that a "break" statement in a condition of the third case
> actually leads to jumping to the fourth case (after the switch).
> This assists a reader who provides an initial scan to notice
> there is a second way to approach the "show_other_directories"
> case than simply the response from directory_exists_in_index().
Wait, I'm lost. Wasn't that break statement the only way to get to
the "show_other_directories" block of code after the switch statement?
I can't see where the second way is; am I missing something?
That is, unless directory_exists_in_index() suddenly starts returning
some value other than the three current possibilities. Perhaps we
should throw a BUG() if we get anything other than index_directory,
index_gitdir, or index_nonexistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> ---
> dir.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> index b460211e61..e48812efe6 100644
> --- a/dir.c
> +++ b/dir.c
> @@ -1659,17 +1659,16 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
> const char *dirname, int len, int baselen, int exclude,
> const struct pathspec *pathspec)
> {
> - int nested_repo = 0;
> -
> /* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */
> - switch (directory_exists_in_index(istate, dirname, len-1)) {
> - case index_directory:
> - return path_recurse;
> + enum exist_status status = directory_exists_in_index(istate, dirname, len-1);
>
> - case index_gitdir:
> + if (status == index_directory)
> + return path_recurse;
> + if (status == index_gitdir)
> return path_none;
>
> - case index_nonexistent:
> + if (status == index_nonexistent) {
> + int nested_repo = 0;
> if ((dir->flags & DIR_SKIP_NESTED_GIT) ||
> !(dir->flags & DIR_NO_GITLINKS)) {
> struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -1682,7 +1681,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
> (exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked));
>
> if (dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES)
> - break;
> + goto show_other_directories;
> if (exclude &&
> (dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO) &&
> (dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO_MODE_MATCHING)) {
> @@ -1711,7 +1710,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
> }
I'd say we'd want to add a BUG("Unhandled value for
directory_exists_in_index: %d\n", status); right here.
>
> /* This is the "show_other_directories" case */
> -
> +show_other_directories:
> if (!(dir->flags & DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES))
> return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
>
> --
> 2.25.0.vfs.1.1
Otherwise, the patch looks good to me and I'll be happy to replace my
patch with this one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-30 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-29 22:03 [PATCH 0/6] Avoid multiple recursive calls for same path in read_directory_recursive() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-29 22:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] dir: consolidate treat_path() and treat_one_path() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-29 22:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] dir: fix broken comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-29 22:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] dir: fix confusion based on variable tense Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-30 15:20 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-01-31 18:04 ` SZEDER Gábor
2020-01-31 18:17 ` Elijah Newren
2020-01-29 22:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] dir: move setting of nested_repo next to its actual usage Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-30 15:33 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-01-30 15:45 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2020-01-30 16:00 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-01-30 16:10 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-01-30 16:20 ` Elijah Newren
2020-01-30 18:17 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-01-29 22:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-30 15:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-01-30 17:13 ` Elijah Newren
2020-01-30 17:45 ` Elijah Newren
2020-01-31 17:13 ` SZEDER Gábor
2020-01-31 17:47 ` Elijah Newren
2020-01-29 22:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] t7063: blindly accept diffs Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-31 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Avoid multiple recursive calls for same path in read_directory_recursive() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-31 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] dir: consolidate treat_path() and treat_one_path() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-31 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] dir: fix broken comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-31 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] dir: fix confusion based on variable tense Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-31 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] dir: refactor treat_directory to clarify control flow Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2020-01-31 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-01-31 18:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] t7063: blindly accept diffs Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Avoid multiple recursive calls for same path in read_directory_recursive() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] t7063: correct broken test expectation Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 13:02 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-03-26 21:18 ` Elijah Newren
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dir: fix simple typo in comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] dir: consolidate treat_path() and treat_one_path() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] dir: fix broken comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] dir: fix confusion based on variable tense Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] dir: refactor treat_directory to clarify control flow Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2020-03-25 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one, fix untracked cache Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 13:13 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Avoid multiple recursive calls for same path in read_directory_recursive() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] t7063: more thorough status checking Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-27 13:09 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-03-29 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-31 20:15 ` Elijah Newren
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] dir: fix simple typo in comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] dir: consolidate treat_path() and treat_one_path() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] dir: fix broken comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] dir: fix confusion based on variable tense Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] dir: refactor treat_directory to clarify control flow Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2020-03-26 21:27 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-27 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Avoid multiple recursive calls for same path in read_directory_recursive() Derrick Stolee
2020-03-28 17:33 ` Elijah Newren
2020-03-29 18:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] t7063: more thorough status checking Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] t3000: add more testcases testing a variety of ls-files issues Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] dir: fix simple typo in comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] dir: consolidate treat_path() and treat_one_path() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] dir: fix broken comment Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] dir: fix confusion based on variable tense Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] dir: refactor treat_directory to clarify control flow Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 13:57 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-04-01 15:59 ` Elijah Newren
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] dir: include DIR_KEEP_UNTRACKED_CONTENTS handling in treat_directory() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] dir: replace double pathspec matching with single " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] Fix error-prone fill_directory() API; make it only return matches Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-07-19 6:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-07-19 12:39 ` Martin Ågren
2020-07-20 15:25 ` Elijah Newren
2020-07-20 18:45 ` [PATCH] dir: check pathspecs before returning `path_excluded` Martin Ågren
2020-07-20 18:49 ` Elijah Newren
2020-07-20 18:51 ` Martin Ågren
2020-07-20 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-20 18:58 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] Fix error-prone fill_directory() API; make it only return matches Junio C Hamano
2020-04-01 4:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] completion: fix 'git add' on paths under an untracked directory Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABPp-BFbXJRW38CeGy78b22MfZ8cNizexCM-+n-ODqy+fOo2uw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.melka@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=sxlijin@gmail.com \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).