From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A791F54E for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347328AbiHSKT2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:19:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33596 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1348205AbiHSKT1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:19:27 -0400 Received: from mailproxy07.manitu.net (mailproxy07.manitu.net [217.11.48.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2F0E3971 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (mail-io1-f50.google.com [209.85.166.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: michael@grubix.eu) by mailproxy07.manitu.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C4AAC826A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:19:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id d68so2951598iof.11 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:19:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3wkwg/JSSae08ujMuzWIAduHU0J7S2XXeyxvHyvfuqoEiPsXyo Qo3660RjUBGLypk5coq4ayKtZqwgCe05UYlQoXM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7DgsUfSRYo6rol0GZLdTcevX/JDUduG7o5hfcKs9hDaBEA69+k6GqzdRhXJV9Y3atI+19Xbu3M8SOsyTs3edY= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:771a:0:b0:67b:d23e:277b with SMTP id n26-20020a6b771a000000b0067bd23e277bmr3078967iom.203.1660904361604; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 03:19:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <09rn6r61-38qo-4s1q-q7qq-p5onp6p87o44@tzk.qr> <2p150404-o6r0-4p10-o0s4-orso00o6n369@tzk.qr> In-Reply-To: <2p150404-o6r0-4p10-o0s4-orso00o6n369@tzk.qr> From: Michael J Gruber Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:19:10 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sequencer: clarify translations To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Phillip Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am Fr., 19. Aug. 2022 um 11:32 Uhr schrieb Johannes Schindelin : > > Hi Michael, > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > thanks for all your input to my RFC patch. I tried to summarize and pack > > everything up into this little series. > > > > A follow-up could (but does not have to) turn translated action names > > into untranslated git command names in some places. > > Thank you for persisting on this, and on behalf of the core Git reviewers > I would like to apologize for the hornets' nest. No need to. After all, this thoroughness is a huge part of what makes git into what it is. It's also why I'ven been participating much less: simply for lack of time. That thoroughness takes time, sometimes much more than expected (and can be frustrating, even in the very technical-physical meaning). But discussions here are always about the best solution (not "whose" solution "wins"), and that is why I'm always happy to be back for a bit. > I offer my ACK to this iteration of the patch series, with or without the > v2 of patch 4/4. Thanks! Personally, I care only about the consistent reflog, which currently means untranslated. Not that I look at the reflog all the time, but ... Michael