From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53517200B9 for ; Thu, 3 May 2018 21:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751276AbeECVvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2018 17:51:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:34911 "EHLO mail-wm0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751190AbeECVvP (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2018 17:51:15 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id o78-v6so1423751wmg.0 for ; Thu, 03 May 2018 14:51:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+nmpjJH91rlFAXTwhh5SXXUFLvVbE/eCN08an6VkIB4=; b=RFKqW6TdWraHHFIrqGahgw5SMlcV/ty8xv2Cc82QjmJ75QjqxI9o3XtsxfhvQ2Pn3k Hvkwy61F7TFEIngLLsUpfUjK3dq8vW6SoRjlDRMhLjax/szSkIycxjVsJzL1zCMMSbSp nABK6UhX9um5YgI8OG3+0sR3FqNSTsPo1vGsNCIU2sDbYohBd24qrPckPdv3a7+53XV3 WT6u1copRQVVDQNqOTomu7oTpG9gcSd5y9b2I03txs/1giVYMy08V82VCbSCOz0u8/5t m9GYT/RA9JiTCSx/CwS14v7Dwx/LWXni12rGN1d8AfZXoeIR/ngOd9MyTstZSxWPsgy1 taqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+nmpjJH91rlFAXTwhh5SXXUFLvVbE/eCN08an6VkIB4=; b=r8kthMy21JOIrq4gdirAQjlyeecJixyUBfJ9vXS1ai9Z6IOVeQfPRtVcvItS/QTmr/ kicxGGNLvfrB4qCHAIoCVzbYRmf9ZAPXZvRsgK0kenn6AvOmBWbcSxMo9Wifyzht3jWd qTQy8gtD4+XvHFC7n35dnlYWa0Ql5v2E/LlMbxutDEDiM23fgNRwAJxVc3iQ3aud+avr kjUbaEa2Oyr4tX6chZd3lHaNMFpMzPDddltKAN45LbHvnrgGolv2geDLJKzjEHv/rJED Pmx82wigfj/LWAJEEbr+FMWL/SnRIzi2e7YCq2DoXoO+IYpnZu+SOE+WQ97wIhcAdBrp WMaw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBbPtgLrzYWVwVEOCfow0R+lfSR+E5agXR7FCWsnx5KUQn+7rYb to/HX2Tay8YV/1lpBGC+h7uO5/202iXPsvPqu/0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZov8vBbscBevA2Iq3Vsii2hO0ATRB+7VxiQTuZ928J0/CY7Ml0IcS9uufbUXi8LXNZf5tIUVSrECBJ0hi4M6fg= X-Received: by 2002:a50:cd45:: with SMTP id d5-v6mr32271534edj.118.1525384274455; Thu, 03 May 2018 14:51:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.234.135 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2018 14:50:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87po2cy5qd.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> References: <87po2cy5qd.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> From: Jacob Keller Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 14:50:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Add `branch-diff`, a `tbdiff` lookalike To: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Git mailing list , Junio C Hamano , Thomas Rast , Thomas Gummerer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:05 AM, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason wrote: > > On Thu, May 03 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> The incredibly useful `git-tbdiff` tool to compare patch series (say, to= see >> what changed between two iterations sent to the Git mailing list) is sli= ghtly >> less useful for this developer due to the fact that it requires the `hun= garian` >> and `numpy` Python packages which are for some reason really hard to bui= ld in >> MSYS2. So hard that I even had to give up, because it was simply easier = to >> reimplement the whole shebang as a builtin command. >> >> The project at https://github.com/trast/tbdiff seems to be dormant, anyw= ay. >> Funny (and true) story: I looked at the open Pull Requests to see how ac= tive >> that project is, only to find to my surprise that I had submitted one in= August >> 2015, and that it was still unanswered let alone merged. > > I've been using branch-diff and haven't found issues with it yet, it > works like tbdiff but better. Faster, uses the same diff as git > (better), and spews to the pager by default. I'm hoping to take a look at this as well, I remember looking into tbdiff in the past, but also had trouble getting it to work. I've tried a variety of similar things, including 4-way parent diffs, but nothing quite gave the results I expected. Thanks! Regards, Jake