From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
Git mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn1313@gmail.com>,
Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 01:28:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+P7+xrA1kCfJF1B13-yPKFgOKLQhcjQ+zJYpnqJuS5wOXk3wQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy2htoen9.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:05 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Original author of the feature (Jacob) cc'ed for insight.
>
Hi,
Sorry I missed this thread last couple months.
> - Can we have refspec->src==NULL in cases other than where
> refspec->matching is true? If not, then perhaps the patch should
> insert, before the problematic "else if" clause, something like
>
> if (match_name_with_pattern(...))
> string_list_append_nodup(...);
> + } else if (refspec->matching) {
> + ... behaviour for the matching case ...
> + } else if (refspec->src == NULL) {
> + BUG("refspec->src cannot be null here");
> } else {
> if (!strcmp(needle, refspec->src))
>
> - We'd need to decide if ignoring is the right behaviour for the
> matching refspec. I do not recall what we decided the logic of
> the function should be offhand.
>
Isn't this patch about how we somehow broke ":" on its own, not as a
negative refspec?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-19 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-19 17:23 [PATCH] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19 9:28 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-20 2:57 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] test-lib-functions: handle --add in test_config Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 7:07 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 19:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-21 20:08 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22 0:00 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22 0:13 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22 2:25 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22 5:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 7:20 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 2:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22 2:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 3:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 3:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19 9:32 ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-22 3:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 6:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Junio C Hamano
2020-12-23 23:56 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-24 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-11 20:22 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2021-01-12 2:01 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+P7+xrA1kCfJF1B13-yPKFgOKLQhcjQ+zJYpnqJuS5wOXk3wQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jacob.keller@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=nipunn1313@gmail.com \
--cc=nipunn@dropbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).