From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5087F207DF for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 17:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756293AbcIPRfv (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:35:51 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com ([209.85.161.177]:34284 "EHLO mail-yw0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753154AbcIPRfu (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:35:50 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id g192so93440553ywh.1 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k4X0ieaecwXrg0FQg1ybblMX2/baCQyWMCdoqErh4wk=; b=QooqgcFtcw9pOZljHKwzo3IDNTCOael3v19ONkvuNjvYb98poyxX9d6n8LSqp7J3nv m3mMzUe4cWcQArUfAoTerV/IWVyqJLijPBy3P1OlCIMsQKa/Fuhp39dpvcdr+DcnBmuO VVS+hOpnKH8gNUZ/2bilHsqNTeWrfInBPxBlHhi12Rhp9AX6+wloHelnKhajMQSGSs4j vQODVPsleIEzGRxjkDkrKE9kJJHQuljHtEc3emX7yLbk9y/sHTd5y/hrIQ+ATyKWYfAe MOPR5e3iLf3AFNdIdE4oU3ubSRWe6Ktye3Ly+or2Dkf1+ZUSm7AvW55cUsAPLhiWOgD6 xvbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k4X0ieaecwXrg0FQg1ybblMX2/baCQyWMCdoqErh4wk=; b=PnkNZBIgZapOrTZrvn8Qy77+G1UAcv09e43pDAWrgE4hyZvZSO8aMm+L+ViBp7w9oA 1S+C1/H3qRyTLGIgFcmIJHyXqjbZNsOYvOhaRPStwYeFS2vE+Tnks6ddyHSizu9F4Czl b+hQEWVLxtQS+EzfnxCLgHiU4rPsN8Mbt1LtOC2bSf+BeFDt6N3DvnIbQZGsa2gutLEb YJPE9FNkVQebUrLD3Bg8KRrEFXYrtbrmETJCmrcEhr/Ng7SlhZARcZF1NsQilXCkXvT8 6WpTqSUvqLRPlM2QJNeJDM8jgDbfQU11mlex3cVZAODAfSDoWLqTAtBUfJPDNiy1Wj47 Y6DQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOcPUN27CM/dx/K7dO3o4EtxJ00RSAoKyuqXWq2+eRZCKcSN2L4RZ7qi/ZrFlZv9m+Ts79hce4mn7pdKg== X-Received: by 10.129.76.6 with SMTP id z6mr15203082ywa.257.1474047288497; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:34:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.96.195 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:34:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28c5d2c59851279858df22e844c6ff7c09f33199.1474046573.git-series.josh@joshtriplett.org> References: <28c5d2c59851279858df22e844c6ff7c09f33199.1474046573.git-series.josh@joshtriplett.org> From: Jacob Keller Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:34:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH] To: Josh Triplett Cc: Git mailing list , Andrew Donnellan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > This provides a shorter and more convenient alias for > --subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'. > > Add a test covering --rfc. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > --- > > By far, the most common subject-prefix I've seen other than "PATCH" is > "RFC PATCH" (or occasionally "PATCH RFC"). Seems worth optimizing for > the common case, to avoid having to spell it out the long way as > --subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'. > I agree! Thanks, Jake