Re: [PATCH v2] sub-process: print the cmd when a capability is unsupported

[Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>]

> On 16 Aug 2017, at 14:40, Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In handshake_capabilities() we use warning() when a capability
> is not supported, so the exit code of the function is 0 and no
> further error is shown. This is a problem because the warning
> message doesn't tell us which subprocess cmd failed.
> 
> On the contrary if we cannot write a packet from this function,
> we use error() and then subprocess_start() outputs:
> 
>    initialization for subprocess '<cmd>' failed
> 
> so we can know which subprocess cmd failed.
> 
> Let's improve the warning() message, so that we can know which
> subprocess cmd failed.
> 
> Helped-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
> ---
> Change since previous version:
> 
>  - Use process->argv[0] instead of adding a new parameter to
>    handshake_capabilities(), thanks to Lars.
> 
> sub-process.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sub-process.c b/sub-process.c
> index 6edb97c1c6..6ccfaaba99 100644
> --- a/sub-process.c
> +++ b/sub-process.c
> @@ -184,8 +184,8 @@ static int handshake_capabilities(struct child_process *process,
> 			if (supported_capabilities)
> 				*supported_capabilities |= capabilities[i].flag;
> 		} else {
> -			warning("external filter requested unsupported filter capability '%s'",
> -				p);
> +			warning("subprocess '%s' requested unsupported capability '%s'",
> +				process->argv[0], p);
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> -- 
> 2.14.1.146.g7de11f915a
> 

Looks good to me.

Thanks,
Lars