From: "Raymond E. Pasco" <ray@ameretat.dev>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apply: Allow "new file" patches on i-t-a entries
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:59:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C4OIIFOZ357K.38YZE7TJFUCV8@ziyou.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlfiuryym.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Tue Aug 4, 2020 at 3:30 PM EDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> How often do we pass ok_if_exists, I have to wonder. If it is often
> enough, then we can check that first way before we even check to see
> if a cache entry for the path even exists or what its i-t-a flag
> says. Something along the lines of this untested code:
>
> if (state->check_index && !ok_if_exists) {
> int pos = index_name_pos(state->repo->index, new_name,
> strlen(new_name));
> if (pos >= 0 &&
> !(state->repo->index->cache[pos]->ce_flags & CE_INTENT_TO_ADD))
> return EXISTS_IN_INDEX;
> }
>
> That is, only if we are told to make sure the path does not already
> exist,
> we see if the path is in the index, and if the cache entry for the
> path in the index is a real entry (as opposed to i-t-a aka "not
> added yet"), we complain. Otherwise we'd happily take the patch.
>
> Whether ok_if_exists is frequently used or not, the resulting code
> may be easier to understand, but I am of course biased, as I just
> wrote it ;-)
ok_if_exists gets passed in cases where a real entry does exist but
we're okay with a new file diff anyway due to other patches in the set
being applied making it valid (type-change diffs and rename diffs) - for
this reason, I didn't pass ok_if_exists, but instead checked here. I
think we're in agreement on this and your logic makes sense in that
light. I'll send an updated patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-04 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-04 16:33 [PATCH] apply: Allow "new file" patches on i-t-a entries Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-04 19:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-04 20:59 ` Raymond E. Pasco [this message]
2020-08-04 22:31 ` [PATCH v2] apply: allow " Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-04 23:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2020-08-05 0:32 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-06 6:01 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] apply: handle i-t-a entries in index Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-06 6:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] apply: allow "new file" patches on i-t-a entries Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-06 6:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] apply: make i-t-a entries never match worktree Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-06 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-06 21:47 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-06 6:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] t4140: test apply with i-t-a paths Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-06 21:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-07 3:44 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] apply: handle i-t-a entries in index Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] apply: allow "new file" patches on i-t-a entries Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 13:47 ` Phillip Wood
2020-08-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] apply: make i-t-a entries never match worktree Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 13:46 ` Phillip Wood
2020-08-08 14:07 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 15:48 ` Phillip Wood
2020-08-08 15:58 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-09 15:25 ` Phillip Wood
2020-08-09 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-10 11:03 ` [PATCH] git-apply.txt: correct description of --cached Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-10 16:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-12 13:32 ` Phillip Wood
2020-08-12 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-12 20:52 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-12 13:59 ` Phillip Wood
2020-08-08 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] t4140: test apply with i-t-a paths Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-23 15:58 ` Phillip Wood
2020-08-08 7:53 ` [PATCH 1/1] diff-lib: use worktree mode in diffs from i-t-a entries Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 8:48 ` Martin Ågren
2020-08-08 10:46 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 14:21 ` Martin Ågren
2020-08-09 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-10 8:53 ` [PATCH] t4069: test diff behavior with i-t-a paths Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-10 8:57 ` [PATCH] diff-lib: use worktree mode in diffs from i-t-a entries Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-10 9:03 ` [RESEND PATCH v2] " Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-10 16:22 ` [PATCH] t4069: test diff behavior with i-t-a paths Junio C Hamano
2020-08-10 16:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-10 21:47 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-10 22:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-10 22:13 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-10 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-10 23:02 ` Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-10 23:21 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-11 3:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-08 7:58 ` [HYPOTHETICAL PATCH 0/2] apply: reject modification diffs to i-t-a entries Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 7:58 ` [HYPOTHETICAL PATCH 1/2] " Raymond E. Pasco
2020-08-08 7:58 ` [HYPOTHETICAL PATCH 2/2] t4140: test failure of diff from empty blob to i-t-a path Raymond E. Pasco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C4OIIFOZ357K.38YZE7TJFUCV8@ziyou.local \
--to=ray@ameretat.dev \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).