git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>
To: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>,
	Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] fsmonitor: handle differences between Windows named pipe functions
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 20:30:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BL0PR05MB5571DD75B080F2790FC82534D9719@BL0PR05MB5571.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48d44c06-34ba-0a1f-dd0d-7d66bd8dfcb9@jeffhostetler.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 4:34 PM
> To: Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>; Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
> <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>; git@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsmonitor: handle differences between Windows
> named pipe functions
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/22/23 4:00 PM, Eric DeCosta wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2023 3:46 PM
> >> To: git@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>; Jeff Hostetler
> >> <git@jeffhostetler.com>; Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>; Eric
> >> DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH v2] fsmonitor: handle differences between Windows
> named
> >> pipe functions
> >>
> >> From: Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>
> >>
> >> The two functions involved with creating and checking for the existance of
> >> the local fsmonitor named pipe, CratedNamedPipeW and
> WaitNamedPipeW
> >> appear to handle names with leading slashes or backslashes a bit
> differently.
> >>
> >> If a repo resolves to a remote file system with the UNC path of //some-
> >> server/some-dir/some-repo, CreateNamedPipeW accepts this name and
> >> creates this named pipe: \\.\pipe\some-server\some-dir\some-repo
> >>
> >> However, when the same UNC path is passed to WaitNamedPipeW, it fails
> >> with ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND.
> >>
> >> Skipping the leading slash for UNC paths works for both
> CreateNamedPipeW
> >> and WaitNamedPipeW. Resulting in a named pipe with the same name as
> >> above that WaitNamedPipeW is able to correctly find.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric DeCosta <edecosta@mathworks.com>
> [...]
> >>
> >>
> >> compat/simple-ipc/ipc-win32.c | 7 ++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/compat/simple-ipc/ipc-win32.c b/compat/simple-ipc/ipc-
> win32.c
> >> index 997f6144344..632b12e1ab5 100644
> >> --- a/compat/simple-ipc/ipc-win32.c
> >> +++ b/compat/simple-ipc/ipc-win32.c
> >> @@ -19,13 +19,18 @@
> >> static int initialize_pipe_name(const char *path, wchar_t *wpath, size_t
> >> alloc) { int off = 0;
> >> + int real_off = 0;
> >> struct strbuf realpath = STRBUF_INIT;
> >>
> >> if (!strbuf_realpath(&realpath, path, 0)) return -1;
> >>
> >> + /* UNC Path, skip leading slash */
> >> + if (realpath.buf[0] == '/' && realpath.buf[1] == '/') real_off = 1;
> >> +
> >> off = swprintf(wpath, alloc, L"\\\\.\\pipe\\");
> >> - if (xutftowcs(wpath + off, realpath.buf, alloc - off) < 0)
> >> + if (xutftowcs(wpath + off, realpath.buf + real_off, alloc - off) < 0)
> >> return -1;
> 
> I haven't had a chance to test this, but this does look
> like a minimal solution for the pathname confusion in the
> MSFT APIs.
> 
> Do you need to test for realpath.buf[0] and [1] being a forward OR
> a backslash ?
> 
> Should we set real_off to 2 rather than 1 because we already
> appended a trailing backslash in the swprintf() ?
> 
Attempts to add additional backslashes after \\.\pipe\\ are apparently
ignored. The name of the local pipe always ends up looking like this:

for UNC paths:
  \\.\pipe\\some-server\some-dir\some-repo
  
and for local paths:
 \\.\pipe\\C_\some-dir\some-repo
  
Thus for a UNC path of //some-server/some-dir/some-repo the simplest thing to
do is to skip the first slash.

> You should run one of those NPFS directory listing tools to
> confirm the exact spelling of the pipe matches your expectation
> here.  Yes, if both functions now work, we should be good, but
> it would be good to confirm your real_off choice, right?
> 
I have used both PowerShell and Process Explorer and see similar results.

> If would be good to (at least interactively) test that the
> git-for-windows installer can find the path and stop the daemon
> on an upgrade or uninstall.  See Johannes' earlier point.
> 
In regards to the GfW installer, if the daemon is running against
a network mounted repo it reports the following:

Could not stop FSMonitor daemon in some-server\some-dir\some-repo
(output: , errors: fatal cannot change to 'some-server\some-dir\some-repo':
No such file or directory)

It looks like the installer may have to do something like:
look for "<drive letter>_" immediately after "\\.\pipe\\" and if it does not
find it, assume a UNC path.

> We should state somewhere that we are running the fsmonitor
> daemon locally and it is watching a remote file system.
> 
> You should run a few stress tests to ensure that the
> MAX_RDCW_BUF_FALLBACK throttling works and that the daemon
> doesn't fall behind on a very busy remote file system.  (There
> are SMB/CIFS wire protocol limits.  See the source.)  (I did
> test this between the combination of systems that I had, but
> YMMV.)
> 
> During the stress test, it would also be good to test that
> IO generated by a client process on your local machine to the
> remote file system is reported, but also that random IO from
> remote processes on the remote system are seen in the event
> stream.  Again, I tested the combinations of machines that I
> had available at the time.
> 
I hear what you are saying, however reporting that information increases
the scope of this change. As this stands right now the advertised feature
of allowing fsmonitor to work on network-mounted sandboxes for Windows
is not working as expected.

-Eric

> Hope this helps,
> Jeff
> 
> 
> >>
> >> /* Handle drive prefix */
> >>
> >> base-commit: f285f68a132109c234d93490671c00218066ace9
> >> --
> >> gitgitgadget
> >
> > Are there any other thoughts about this?
> >
> > I believe that this is the simplest change possible that will ensure that
> > fsmonitor correctly handles network repos.
> >
> > -Eric


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-08 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-24 17:14 [PATCH] fsmonitor: handle differences between Windows named pipe functions Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2023-03-27 11:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2023-03-27 15:02   ` Jeff Hostetler
2023-03-27 16:08     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-06 19:08     ` Eric DeCosta
2023-04-07 20:55       ` Jeff Hostetler
2023-04-10 19:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric DeCosta via GitGitGadget
2023-04-22 20:00   ` Eric DeCosta
2023-04-26 20:33     ` Jeff Hostetler
2023-04-27 13:45       ` Jeff Hostetler
2023-05-08 20:30       ` Eric DeCosta [this message]
2023-05-15 21:50         ` Jeff Hostetler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BL0PR05MB5571DD75B080F2790FC82534D9719@BL0PR05MB5571.namprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=edecosta@mathworks.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).