From: "Santi Béjar" <santi@agolina.net>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de,
martinvz <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/2] pull --rebase: Avoid spurious conflicts and reapplying unnecessary patches
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:17:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim6Tg7fNqxFYGU=bxQAn24ipkNaiENU5waCyQ4y@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikt6kRZRGW5Y=0qFf41P2HVLe97qGH=5ya5gcbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the review and comments!
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> All this makes sense.
>>>
>>> But can you explain when it happens? One possibility is when you don't
>>> fork from the tracking branch as in:
>>
>> That's one possibility. Patch 1/2 in this thread contains testcases
>> for two others. Another possibility is having your patches get
>> upstream by some alternative route (e.g. pulling your changes to a
>> third machine, pushing from there, and then going back to your
>> original machine and trying to pull --rebase).
>
> I think this is commit message material.
I just want to add one thing, thanks for your great commit message.
Although the patch itself if 7 lines it is fantastic to have a commit
message explaining all the historical context and this level of
detail.
Thanks,
Santi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 5:56 [PATCHv4 0/2] Fix spurious conflicts with pull --rebase Elijah Newren
2010-08-12 5:56 ` [PATCHv4 1/2] t5520-pull: Add testcases showing spurious conflicts from git " Elijah Newren
2010-08-12 5:56 ` [PATCHv4 2/2] pull --rebase: Avoid spurious conflicts and reapplying unnecessary patches Elijah Newren
2010-08-12 13:34 ` Santi Béjar
2010-08-12 14:37 ` Santi Béjar
2010-08-12 14:40 ` Santi Béjar
2010-08-12 21:02 ` Elijah Newren
2010-08-12 22:51 ` Santi Béjar
2010-08-12 20:19 ` Elijah Newren
2010-08-12 22:08 ` Santi Béjar
2010-08-12 23:17 ` Santi Béjar [this message]
2010-08-12 22:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-13 1:47 ` Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTim6Tg7fNqxFYGU=bxQAn24ipkNaiENU5waCyQ4y@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=santi@agolina.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).