1. Re: Is the sha256 object format experimental or not?
- by dwh @ 2021-05-13 20:29 UTC [2%]
2. Re: Typesafer git hash patch
- by brian m. carlson @ 2017-02-28 20:19 UTC [0%]
3. Transition plan for git to move to a new hash function
- by Ian Jackson @ 2017-02-27 13:00 UTC [1%]
4. Re: SHA1 collisions found
- by brian m. carlson @ 2017-02-26 18:30 UTC [4%]
5. Re: SHA1 collisions found
- by brian m. carlson @ 2017-02-26 17:38 UTC [5%]
6. Re: SHA1 collisions found
- by Mike Hommey @ 2017-02-25 22:09 UTC [5%]
7. Re: SHA1 collisions found
- by Jeff King @ 2017-02-25 19:26 UTC [4%]
8. Re: SHA1 collisions found
- by brian m. carlson @ 2017-02-25 18:50 UTC [7%]
9. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by Junio C Hamano @ 2016-07-22 15:59 UTC [0%]
10. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by Johannes Schindelin @ 2016-07-21 13:19 UTC [0%]
11. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by Johannes Schindelin @ 2016-07-21 12:53 UTC [0%]
12. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by Duy Nguyen @ 2016-07-20 14:48 UTC [5%]
13. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by Herczeg Zsolt @ 2016-07-19 18:58 UTC [4%]
14. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by brian m. carlson @ 2016-07-18 23:03 UTC [6%]
15. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by Junio C Hamano @ 2016-07-18 18:00 UTC [0%]
16. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by brian m. carlson @ 2016-07-17 22:04 UTC [4%]
17. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by Theodore Ts'o @ 2016-07-17 16:23 UTC [5%]
18. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by brian m. carlson @ 2016-07-17 15:42 UTC [6%]
19. Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
- by brian m. carlson @ 2016-07-17 14:21 UTC [4%]
Results 1-19 of 19 | reverse | options above
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).