From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] commit: add an option the reword HEAD
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:58:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95cc6fb2-d1bc-11de-febe-c2b5c78a6850@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2009232241140.5061@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Hi Dscho
On 23/09/2020 21:42, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Phillip Wood wrote:
>
>> On 23/09/2020 11:22, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>>>>
>>>> If one notices a typo in the last commit after starting to stage
>>>> changes for the next commit it is useful to be able to reword the last
>>>> commit without changing its contents. Currently the way to do that is
>>>> by specifying --amend --only with no pathspec which is not that
>>>> obvious to new users (so much so that before beb635ca9c ("commit:
>>>> remove 'Clever' message for --only --amend", 2016-12-09) commit
>>>> printed a message to congratulate the user on figuring out how to do
>>>> it). If the last commit is empty one has to pass --allow-empty as well
>>>> even though the contents are not being changed. This commits adds a
>>>> --reword option for commit that rewords the last commit without
>>>> changing its contents.
>>>
>>> I would like to explain the idea I tried to get across when I proposed to
>>> implement support for `reword!` (and `--reword`) because I feel that it
>>> will change the design of this patch in a rather big way.
>>>
>>> First of all, let me explain the scenario in which I long for the
>>> `--reword` option: I maintain several patch thickets, the most obvious one
>>> being Git for Windows' patch thicket that is merge-rebased [*1*] onto
>>> every new Git version.
>>>
>>> At times, I need to adjust a commit message in that patch thicket. It
>>> would be quite wasteful to perform a full merge-rebase, therefore I
>>> typically call `git commit --squash <commit> -c <commit>`, copy the
>>> oneline, paste it after the `squash!` line (surrounded by empty lines), and
>>> then reword the commit message. When the next Git version comes out, I do
>>> a merging-rebase, and when the editor pops up because of that `squash!`
>>> oneline, I remove the now-obsolete version(s) of the commit message.
>>>
>>> Obviously, I have to be careful to either also pass `--only` (which I
>>> somehow managed to learn about only today) or I have to make sure that I
>>> have no staged changes. In practice, I actually specify a bogus path,
>>> which has the same effect as `--only`.
>>>
>>> What I would actually rather have is the `--reword` option: `git commit
>>> --reword <commit>`. In my mind, this would _add_ a new, "empty" commit,
>>> letting me edit the commit message of the specified commit, and using that
>>> as commit message, prefixed with the line `reword! <oneline>`.
>>>
>>> This, in turn, would need to be accompanied by support in the interactive
>>> rebase, to perform the desired reword (which is admittedly quite a bit
>>> different from what the way the todo command `reword` works).
>>>
>>> With that in mind, I would like to caution against the design of your
>>> current patch, because it would slam the door shut on the way I would like
>>> `--reword` to work.
>>
>> I'm keen to have an easy way to reword HEAD and a way to implement your
>> reword! idea.
>>
>> I posted a comment on your gitgitgadget issue about reword! and drop![1]
>> pointing to some patches[2] that implement the reword! idea as amend!. I think
>> we want to be able to fixup a commit and reword it at the same time which is
>> way I chose the name amend! rather than reword! The implementation currently
>> changes `git commit --amend` to take an optional commit which isn't ideal. I
>> wonder if calling it revise! would be better then we could have `git commit
>> --reword` to reword HEAD and `git commit --revise <commit>` to create a commit
>> that will reword and fixup <commit> when the user runs `git rebase -i
>> --autostash`. fold! is another possibility.
>>
>> I don't think this patch series stops us implementing something for rebase but
>> it would mean we couldn't use the name reword! unless we allow `git commit
>> --reword` to take an optional commit which I'm not that keen on.
>>
>> What do you think to an alternative name?
>
> I am really worried that the proliferation of confusingly similar options
> will increase Git's reputation for being awfully hard to use.
That is certainly a consideration, but not having a way to easily reword
the last commit without changing its contents does not to improve Git's
user friendliness. If you only just discovered using --only for
rewording it's a fair bet a lot of regular users are unaware of it.
The reason I'm not keen on having --amend or --reword take an optional
commit is that I think it is confusing as it means sometimes that option
creates a new commit and sometimes it modifies the last commit
furthermore passing --reword=HEAD would not reword HEAD but creates a
reword! commit.
Rewording the last commit and creating a reword! commit are two
different operations so I'm not sure having different options for them
is that bad. To me the real confusion is that we end up with 3 options
that create different flavors of fixup commits. It would be much nicer
if there was a single fixup type that reworded the message as well as
fixing up the contents and users just passed `--no-edit` to avoid
changing the message. I'd really like to somehow change the semantics of
`git commit --fixup/--squash` and the rebase `fixup`/`squash` commands
to actually reword the commit. I guess that would mean an opt-in config
setting which isn't ideal.
As an aside I'd like to see a new `rewrite` command that wraps the
functionality of `rebase -i` so the user does not have to deal with
fixups and editing a todo list. `git rewrite amend <commit>` would be
equivalent to starting a rebase and marking <commit> as `edit`, the user
can then make their changes and run `git rewrite continue` which would
finish the rebase or `git rewrite amend <another-commit>` which would
either alter the todo list to mark <another-commit> as `edit` or create
new entries to rewind the rebase if <another-commit> is not in the todo
list and then run `git rebase --continue`. Additionally there would be
`reword` and `drop` commands and support for blame so that the user can
do all this from an editor which would run `git rewrite amend -L
<current-line> <current-file>` to amend the commit that introduced the
current line. I've got a nasty scheme prototype of this and I've found
it really useful. For an individual developer developing a patch series
it is much more convenient to just edit the history directly rather than
creating fixup! commits (which often seem to have conflicts when they
are applied). It would not address your use where you don't want to be
rebasing all the time though.
Best Wishes
Phillip
> Ciao,
> Dscho
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-21 13:30 [PATCH 0/3] commit: add an option to reword the last commit Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2020-09-21 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] commit docs: use backquotes when quoting options Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2020-09-21 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit: reorder synopsis Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2020-09-22 5:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-22 13:27 ` Phillip Wood
2020-09-22 16:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-21 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] commit: add an option the reword HEAD Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2020-09-21 15:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-21 18:05 ` Phillip Wood
2020-09-21 18:12 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-09-21 19:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-22 13:38 ` Phillip Wood
2020-09-22 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-21 17:04 ` Christian Couder
2020-09-21 18:01 ` Phillip Wood
2020-09-23 10:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-09-23 18:23 ` Phillip Wood
2020-09-23 20:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-09-24 9:58 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2020-09-24 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-21 16:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] commit: add an option to reword the last commit Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95cc6fb2-d1bc-11de-febe-c2b5c78a6850@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).