git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>
To: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbach94@gmail.com>,
	"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout <tree-ish> clearer
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 00:28:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9535BE255A654CADB7B0AE7599A6FA96@PhilipOakley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1492287435.14812.2.camel@gmail.com

From: "Christoph Michelbach" <michelbach94@gmail.com>
> While technically in the documentation, the fact that changes
> introduced by a checkout <tree-ish> are staged automatically, was
> not obvious when reading its documentation. It is now specifically
> pointed out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Michelbach <michelbach94@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/git-checkout.txt | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt 
> b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
> index 8e2c066..cfd7b18 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
> @@ -85,9 +85,10 @@ Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the 
> current branch.
> from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a
> commit). In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are
> meaningless and giving either of them results in an error. The
> - <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish
> - (i.e. commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given

Do these lines above actually need reflowing? Their content hasn't changed 
making it more difficult to spot the significant changes below here.

> - paths before updating the working tree.
> + <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify the tree-ish (i.e.
> + commit, tag, or tree) to update the index to for the given paths
> + before updating the working tree accordingly.

> +                               Note that this means
> + that the changes this command introduces are staged automatically.

Does this actually capture the intent of the user confusion it's meant to 
cover? I may have missed the original discussions.

For a clean commit checkout my mental model is not one of anything new being 
actively staged i.e. different from what was in the commit. I can see that 
if a particular tree is checkout then it's implicit staging could well be a 
surprise.

I am in favour of improving the documentation to avoid user surprise

> +
> 'git checkout' with <paths> or `--patch` is used to restore modified or
> deleted paths to their original contents from the index or replace paths
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>
--
Philip 


  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-15 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-15 20:17 [PATCH] Documentation/git-checkout: make doc. of checkout <tree-ish> clearer Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-15 23:28 ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2017-04-16 13:01   ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-16 18:03     ` Philip Oakley
2017-04-16 18:51       ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-16 21:25         ` Philip Oakley
2017-04-16 22:06           ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-17 16:04             ` Philip Oakley
     [not found]               ` <1492452173.11708.22.camel@gmail.com>
2017-04-17 20:59                 ` Philip Oakley
2017-04-18  0:31                   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-18 12:26                     ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-19  1:40                       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-22 17:12                         ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-24  1:55                           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-24 12:24                             ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-24 12:46                             ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-25  1:35                               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-25  9:11                                 ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-19  7:32                     ` Philip Oakley
2017-04-18 11:50                   ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-18  0:26               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-18 12:02                 ` Christoph Michelbach
2017-04-19  8:14                 ` Philip Oakley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9535BE255A654CADB7B0AE7599A6FA96@PhilipOakley \
    --to=philipoakley@iee.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michelbach94@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).