From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] rebase -i: use struct rebase_options to parse args
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:59:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94fe6518-ca13-8eb8-d455-e2a6fcaeb1d6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwokssvq6.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio
On 21/03/2019 04:21, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +static struct replay_opts get_replay_opts(const struct rebase_options *opts)
>> +{
>> + struct replay_opts replay = REPLAY_OPTS_INIT;
>> +
>> + sequencer_init_config(&replay);
>> +
>> + replay.action = REPLAY_INTERACTIVE_REBASE;
>> + replay.signoff = opts->signoff;
>> + replay.allow_ff = !(opts->flags & REBASE_FORCE);
>> + if (opts->allow_rerere_autoupdate)
>> + replay.allow_rerere_auto = opts->allow_rerere_autoupdate;
>> + replay.allow_empty = 1;
>> + replay.allow_empty_message = opts->allow_empty_message;
>> + replay.verbose = opts->flags & REBASE_VERBOSE;
>> + replay.reschedule_failed_exec = opts->reschedule_failed_exec;
>> + replay.gpg_sign = xstrdup_or_null(opts->gpg_sign_opt);
>> + replay.strategy = opts->strategy;
>> +
>> + return replay;
>> +}
>
> This calls init_config() and then sets .action; does it revert to
> what dl/merge-cleanup-scissors-fix wants to do, which flipped the
> order to fix some bug? It is a bit hard to tell.
dl/merge-cleanup-scissors-fix changes sequencer_init_config() to depend
on the value of action so action should to be set first. What is in pu
at the moment in not quite right (though I'm not sure what the practical
implications are as it looks like the rebase tests are passing[1]).
[1] https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/509332448
> Unfortunately because of the earlier huge code movement the changes
> to _this_ file does not conflict and cleanly merges, but because the
> other file is removed by this series while a topic in flight updates
> it, the semantic conflict like this luckily gets discovered.
>
> Especially since this is still an RFC, I'd preferred to see it
> without moving around the code too much (instead, exporting some
> symbols that need to be visible with each other after renaming them
> to more appropriate names that are fit in the global namespace).
I'm happy to try doing that, though the textual conflict would be in a
different place in the file to the semantic conflict but at least they'd
both be in the same file. I think it would only need to share the
definitions of struct rebase_options, enum rebase_action and the
declaration of run_rebase_interactive(). Would you be happy with the
addition of builtin/rebase.h (there don't seem to be another headers in
that directory). We could leave rebase--interactive.c around until
rebase--preserve-merges.sh is finally removed.
Best Wishes
Phillip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-21 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 19:03 [RFC PATCH 00/11] rebase -i run without forking rebase--interactive Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] sequencer: always discard index after checkout Phillip Wood
2019-03-20 1:50 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-21 14:35 ` Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] rebase: rename write_basic_state() Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] rebase: use OPT_RERERE_AUTOUPDATE() Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] rebase -i: combine rebase--interactive.c with rebase.c Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] rebase -i: remove duplication Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] rebase -i: use struct commit when parsing options Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] rebase -i: use struct object_id for squash_onto Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] rebase -i: use struct rebase_options to parse args Phillip Wood
2019-03-21 4:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 14:59 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2019-03-22 3:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-21 21:13 ` Alban Gruin
2019-04-10 19:16 ` Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] rebase -i: use struct rebase_options in do_interactive_rebase() Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] rebase: use a common action enum Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 20:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-21 14:43 ` Phillip Wood
2019-03-19 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] rebase -i: run without forking rebase--interactive Phillip Wood
2019-03-20 20:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] rebase -i " Josh Steadmon
2019-03-20 23:05 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-21 14:40 ` Phillip Wood
2019-03-21 1:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 00/12] Run rebase -i " Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] sequencer: always discard index after checkout Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] rebase: don't translate trace strings Phillip Wood
2019-04-19 5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-25 17:47 ` Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] rebase: rename write_basic_state() Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] rebase: use OPT_RERERE_AUTOUPDATE() Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] rebase -i: combine rebase--interactive.c with rebase.c Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] rebase -i: remove duplication Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] rebase -i: use struct commit when parsing options Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] rebase -i: use struct object_id for squash_onto Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] rebase -i: use struct rebase_options to parse args Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] rebase -i: use struct rebase_options in do_interactive_rebase() Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] rebase: use a common action enum Phillip Wood
2019-04-17 14:30 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] rebase -i: run without forking rebase--interactive Phillip Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94fe6518-ca13-8eb8-d455-e2a6fcaeb1d6@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).