From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan del Strother Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing path quoting issues Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:12:08 +0100 Message-ID: <92879AC5-2927-439B-8EB0-AC20AAEE412E@steelskies.com> References: <11920508172434-git-send-email-jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv> <470DC05A.8020209@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 13 20:17:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IglTr-0001fM-VH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:12:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932730AbXJMSMO (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:12:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932710AbXJMSMO (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:12:14 -0400 Received: from smtp1.betherenow.co.uk ([87.194.0.68]:39452 "EHLO smtp1.bethere.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762506AbXJMSMM (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:12:12 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.65] (87-194-43-188.bethere.co.uk [87.194.43.188]) by smtp1.bethere.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 5614998229; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:12:10 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <470DC05A.8020209@viscovery.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 11 Oct 2007, at 07:19, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> - git-commit -F msg -m amending ." >> + git-commit -F msg -m amending ." > > You fix whitespace... > >> test_expect_success \ >> - "using message from other commit" \ >> - "git-commit -C HEAD^ ." >> + "using message from other commit" \ >> + "git-commit -C HEAD^ ." > > ... and you break it. More of these follow. Don't do that, it makes > patch review unnecessarily hard. I'm just preparing to release this patch... was that "don't break whitespace", or "don't try to fix whitespace in a patch that's has nothing to do with whitespacing-fixing" ? And while I'm here - tabs are preferred, are they? There seem to be a mixture of tabs & 4 space indentation.