From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7DB215F4 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754772AbeD3TRp (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:17:45 -0400 Received: from bsmtp7.bon.at ([213.33.87.19]:48010 "EHLO bsmtp7.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753482AbeD3TRo (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:17:44 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp7.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40ZZ7B5VXXz5tl9; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 21:17:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0411C94; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 21:17:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: js/no-pager-shorthand [was: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2018, #04; Mon, 30)] To: Junio C Hamano References: Cc: git@vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <918c69be-89ce-c66d-92ee-4821e9412793@kdbg.org> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 21:17:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 30.04.2018 um 05:25 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > * js/no-pager-shorthand (2018-04-25) 1 commit > - git: add -N as a short option for --no-pager > > "git --no-pager cmd" did not have short-and-sweet single letter > option. Now it does. > > Will merge to 'next'. I consider your argument that -N is only an abbreviation for an unspecific "no" a valid one. So, I would like to be sure that we are not painting us into the wrong corner by squatting -N for --no-pager. I find -P is not that bad after all. -- Hannes